home bbs files messages ]

Forums before death by AOL, social media and spammers... "We can't have nice things"

   rec.drugs.misc      Misc. recreational drugs      5,419 messages   

[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]

   Message 5,359 of 5,419   
   Bobbie Sellers to Intelligent Party   
   Re: THERE IS NO GHOST IN THE FETUS IN TH   
   06 May 23 13:36:20   
   
   XPost: alt.activism.drug-war, talk.politics.drugs, uk.politics.drugs   
   XPost: alt.drugs, rec.drugs.smart   
   From: bliss@mouse-potato.com   
      
   On 5/6/23 00:39, Intelligent Party wrote:   
   > There is no ghost in the fetus in the first 17.333 Weeks = FOUR MONTHS.   
      
      
   	No evidence of any ghost at any stage of life from conception to death.   
     The so-called immortal soul is just a way to con the believer and make   
   them submissive to the dictates of organized religion's grift.   
      
   	I won't bother with the rest of your remarks because in many respects I   
   agree.   
      
   >   
   > Women with FOUR MONTHS to abort, who do not abort; are COMMITTED to the   
   > pregnancy, and do not seek an abortion after four months.  (While in   
   > illegal unholy States, women WITHOUT four months to abort, may still be   
   > seeking an abortion, after four months, as they have been DENIED, their   
   > human right to abortion).   
   >   
   > After FOUR MONTHS, of ability to abort, some women may still seek to   
   > abort a HANDICAPPED fetus.  But there is likely NO GHOST in a   
   > handicapped fetus, BECAUSE the ghost comes in, BETWEEN four months and   
   > birth, and why would a ghost enter a handicapped fetus, until the last   
   > minute!?   
   >   
   > Furthermore, you have an ABSOLUTE right to separate your body,   
   > absolutely, so forced surrogate mothers of a handicapped fetus, is a CRIME!   
   >   
   > Would you bring a handicapped baby into the world, and tell it to live   
   > its whole entire life handicapped from birth?  Even if there WAS a ghost   
   > in the fetus at some point, it looses WHAT? by reincarnating?  It looses   
   > it's body, it's intelligence, it's property, it's friends, it's career;   
   > it has none!  If your ONE YEAR OLD, got in an accident and lost its arms   
   > and its legs, would you put it to death, for its own sake?  Would you   
   > wait until it was FIVE, to say, maybe you should take these suicide   
   > pills or a do a Heroin overdose tonight?   
   >   
   > Yet infant male Circumcision is a CRIME.  Female Genital mutilation is a   
   > CRIME. Sexual assignment surgery of infant Hermaphrodites/Intersex is a   
   > CRIME.  Female genital mutilation is like cutting the male dickhead   
   > off.  Infant male circumcision is like trimming an infant female's pussy   
   > lips.  Doing this to a baby is like doing this to an ADULT AGAINST THEIR   
   > WILL.  All three atrocities are obviously against the Hippocratic oath   
   > and should be OUTLAWED!   
   >   
   > Yet the RELIGIOUS RIGHT, believe in life before life, and life after   
   > death, so why would they believe, you come out of a zygote?  Every   
   > religion confirms reincarnation.  (Jesus confirmed John the Baptist is   
   > the reincarnation of Elijah. Reincarnation is not the only option, yet a   
   > common choice.)   
   >   
   > It's all population vs. property; it's all labor vs. capital.  Poverty   
   > and unequal poverty are the root of all kinds of evil, and   
   > overpopulation is the root of poverty.  Overpopulation is the scourge of   
   > our nation!  Bankrupt unskilled immigrants, from poor countries, are let   
   > in by Democrats, and Bankrupt unskilled unplanned children, are let in   
   > by Republicans!  Both parties are OUT OF IT, and deserve redemption!   
   >   
   > Yet we SHOULD have FREE ABORTIONS, in the FIRST FOUR MONTHS, for   
   > EVERYONE, but parental consent is a CRIME!  EVERY TEEN HAS AN ABSOLUTE   
   > RIGHT TO ABORTION, WITHOUT THEIR PARENTS PERMISSION, NOR NOTIFICATION!   
   > Further, children are meant to be BROUGHT UP, and not belittled, eleven   
   > year olds are adults, and should be treated as such, and afforded the   
   > EQUAL RIGHTS OF MAN.   
   >   
   > Yet if you do not use birth control, you will get pregnant tonight, in a   
   > single sex act.  Use hormonal plus one, of either condoms, pull-out, or   
   > diaphragm, OR use all the other three, condoms, pull-out, and diaphragm,   
   > concurrently.   
   >   
   > For on the pill alone, in twelve years, you will be pregnant.   
   >   
   > For sporadic sex, Men should use condoms and pull-out concurrently.   
   > For ongoing sex, men should use hormonal plus one, or all the other   
   > three, concurrently.   
   > For both sporadic and ongoing sex, Women should always use hormonal plus   
   > one, or all the other three concurrently, since they initially have no   
   > control over pull-out anyway, to keep it simple.   
   >   
   > While using hormonal birth control, should basically be a woman's   
   > independent choice; AS ONLY 25% of women actually are ON hormonal birth   
   > control, and IUDs; its basically going to be condoms and the pull-out   
   > method, or you additionally get a diaphragm going, or bring back the   
   > Today Sponge, to the market, who's patent has expired, and anyone can   
   > now commercially produce (or add the rhythm method).   
   >   
   > For sporadic sex, men merely use condoms and pull-out.   
   >   
   > For ongoing sex, men use HORMONAL PLUS ONE, or all the other three, of   
   > condoms and pull-out and diaphragm.   
   >   
   > Women always use hormonal plus one, or all the other three of condoms   
   > and pull-out and diaphragm (to remain simple, as control over the   
   > pull-out with a new friend is limited anyway).   
   >   
   > (so there are two analytical questions: 1) whether ongoing or sporadic,   
   > and 2) whether using hormonal or not; means four possibilities).   
   >   
   > What actually *is* sporadic, is a question:  While the number of sex   
   > acts used to determine the risks is 80-100 per year, (eight per month),   
   > it MAY be, that as few as just TWO acts per month (24 per year) may   
   > actually make it just as dangerous as eight times per month.  30% of   
   > couples, trying, get pregnant in 1 month, 30% in 3 months, 20% in 6   
   > months, 20% in 12 months or longer.   
   >   
   > Women who do not have access to either hormonal or a diaphragm, may want   
   > to consider learning the rhythm methods, and using condoms and pull-out,   
   > two weeks out of month when safe, and abstaining from intercourse other   
   > two weeks. This makes for TWO methods, rhythm and condoms, INITIALLY,   
   > and then THREE when, control over pull-out is more possible with an   
   > ongoing more trusted partner.   
   >   
   > And keeping semen out of orifices is a general good idea for sporadic   
   > sex.  And for sporadic sex you want condoms for STDs.   
   >   
   > So for ongoing, you have more sex, which makes it more dangerous for   
   > pregnancy, but you don't have to worry as much about STDs (assuming you   
   > have only one partner) especially if you get tested for HIV, Gonorrhea,   
   > Chlamydia, & Syphilis. (NO tests for Herpes, Crabs, Scabies,   
   > Trichomoniasis; but be vaccinated for HPV/Warts & Hepatitis A and B).   
   >   
   > Sex is a positive holy religious activity, which should NOT be   
   > condemned, but unsafe sex is immoral, for unplanned childbirth is the   
   > scourge of nations.  Thus, slut pride, not slut shame!   
   >   
      
   [continued in next message]   
      
   --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05   
    * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)   

[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]


(c) 1994,  bbs@darkrealms.ca