Forums before death by AOL, social media and spammers... "We can't have nice things"
|    rec.gambling.lottery    |    Strategy and news of lotteries and sweep    |    63,804 messages    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
|    Message 62,078 of 63,804    |
|    Ion Saliu to Marmaduke Jinks    |
|    Re: Alfred Beuttell's Roulette System    |
|    11 Sep 21 04:06:01    |
      From: ionsaliu@gmail.com              On Friday, September 10, 2021 at 8:34:12 PM UTC+3, Marmaduke Jinks wrote:       >       > He should have said "stop at a winner" and Go Home. I used "Stop at a        > winner" on my Ladbroke betting slips back in the 90's        >        >        > MJ Martsopolleahk              Martsopolleahk et al.:              There is a more generalized case raised in newsgroups several years ago. O       tempora! O mores!              • "Obviously in roulette betting on in the long run you are going to lose       your money but at some point, chances are you'll be in profit. To take an       extreme example if you had $1000 you could reasonably expect to be ahead $1 at       some point.       • Is it possible to generalize this? I want to win W dollars at which point       I will quit. How much cash C would I need to have a probability P of       succeeding? Let's say I'm betting on a 37 number roulette wheel (18 red 18       black and one green 0)?"              • https://saliu.com/roulette2.html       • Probability, Odds to Win at Roulette in N Number of Spins — Winning and       Quitting on Red/Black in Roulette.              --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05        * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
(c) 1994, bbs@darkrealms.ca