From: lotteryprediction@gmail.com
在 2022年1月2日星期日 UTC+8 19:45:05， 写道：
> "??? Wang Qianyi (Nan)" wrote in message
> news:68654bd5-0890-49d1...@googlegroups.com...
> Winning Numbers
> 14 29 31 41 43 56 +42
>
> I will not count bonus number this year.
>
> Last year, I designed and played in two AI competitors, Leela and AlphaZero,
> which used random patterns and human-adjusted patterns to learn from
> mistakes and data.
> ~~~~~
>
> So Nan, you say that your two AI competitors used human-adjusted patterns.
> Did they actually show any AI in choosing numbers, rather than using human
> direction to choose? How many did they get wrong?
>
> MJ
You can think of AI as the matrix's savior and the human designer as the
matrix's creator. Although the entire universe is designed by the designer in
the film, the Savior does not rule out the possibility of breaking the balance
and the occurrence of
bugs. Overall, the AI creates data from a big amount of pseudo-random data
screening and does self-analysis and adjustment based on a certain amount of
human random data screening. Importantly, rather than depending on human
self-awareness
indoctrination, this analysis is based on the AI's own assessment. There are
numerous elements that go into the decision, which are difficult to disclose
here, but they are not as straightforward as statistics.
To draw an analogy, imagine that the matrix is manipulating the reality that
humans live in, and the lottery outcomes are just a virtual replica of the
real world. Then we can think and experiment in the opposite direction,
putting ourselves in the
position of God and developing conscious robots that make their own decisions.
We can then deduce that if the universe is virtual, then the virtual programs
we construct can find the realities of the real world. If AI surpasses human
performance, the
possibility of us living in a virtual environment cannot be excluded.
Nan
--- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
* Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)
|
