From: Jinks@Totopoly.com   
      
   "??? Wang Qianyi (Nan)"  wrote in message   
   news:9b768ca7-3c09-4674-b6d3-9c01ce28434en@googlegroups.com...   
   ? 2022?1?2???? UTC+8 19:45:05, ??:   
   > "??? Wang Qianyi (Nan)"  wrote in message   
   > news:68654bd5-0890-49d1...@googlegroups.com...   
   > Winning Numbers   
   > 14 29 31 41 43 56 +42   
   >   
   > I will not count bonus number this year.   
   >   
   > Last year, I designed and played in two AI competitors, Leela and   
   > AlphaZero,   
   > which used random patterns and human-adjusted patterns to learn from   
   > mistakes and data.   
   > ~~~~~   
   >   
   > So Nan, you say that your two AI competitors used human-adjusted patterns.   
   > Did they actually show any AI in choosing numbers, rather than using human   
   > direction to choose?   
      
   You can think of AI as the matrix's savior and the human designer as the   
   matrix's creator. Although the entire universe is designed by the designer   
   in the film, the creator does not rule out the possibility of breaking the   
   balance and the occurrence of bugs. Overall, the AI creates data from a big   
   amount of pseudo-random data screening and does self-analysis and adjustment   
   based on a certain amount of human random data screening. Importantly,   
   rather than depending on human self-awareness indoctrination, this analysis   
   is based on the AI's own assessment. There are numerous elements that go   
   into the decision, which are difficult to disclose here, but they are not as   
   straightforward as statistics.   
      
   To draw an analogy, imagine that the matrix is manipulating the reality that   
   humans live in, and the lottery outcomes are just a virtual replica of the   
   real world. Then we can think and experiment in the opposite direction,   
   putting ourselves in the position of God and developing conscious robots   
   that make their own decisions. We can then deduce that if the universe is   
   virtual, then the virtual programs we construct can find the realities of   
   the real world. If AI surpasses human performance, the possibility of us   
   living in a virtual environment cannot be excluded.   
      
   How many did they get wrong?   
      
   Debating whether the lottery's randomness can be solved is as pointless as   
   debating whether God created the cosmos. Statistics aren't very useful in   
   this situation. Instead, we can pretend the existence of a designer and   
   engage in a conversation to inquire about the possibility of specific events   
   by number, which is a means to test whether randomness has a solution.   
   >   
   > MJ   
      
      
   Nan   
      
   ~   
      
   Hmm, yes.   
      
   We're not on the same page.  Artificial Intelligence is where the machine   
   develops it's own intelligence without relying on the natural intelligence   
   of humans.  The history of AI shows lots of mistakes along the way.  An AI   
   that has not made any mistakes is surely incredible.  But that's not a bad   
   thing per se, we learn from mistakes.   
      
   I'm intrigued by your two AIs.  I wish them well.   
      
   MJ   
      
   --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05   
    * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)