From: lotteryprediction@gmail.com   
      
   在 2022年2月14日星期一 UTC+8 23:29:07， 写道：   
   > "??? Wang Qianyi (Nan)"  wrote in message    
   > news:f28bf1df-4265-481b...@googlegroups.com...   
   > In fact, this rubric ignores the ability to actually invest in 14 rounds.    
   > Over time, the amount of investment will skyrocket. Even if a player    
   > predicted 3 out of 11 in round 14, earning a high score of 402,810, I reckon    
   > that there should be a relevant formula to subtract the deduction for    
   > investment possibility.    
   >    
   > My initial criteria is as follows:    
   > Winners of rounds 1-5 are assessed a score based on the actual prize.    
   > Players who win rounds 6-11, although the prize money is high, should divide    
   > the final score by 10 to get the final score.    
   > For the winners of rounds 12-14, although the prize money is high, the final    
   > score is divided by 100.    
   >    
   > What do you guys think?   
   > ~~    
   >    
   > I'll give it a go if others are. 11 seems low.    
   >    
   > What I do know is this.    
   >    
   > 3 from 19 is 969. At £1.50 a go that's £1,454. Pick 3 pays £1,500. I    
   > think if you can consistently get 3 from 19 then you'd be a winner. It's    
   > finessing the number of numbers that you choose.    
   >    
   > MJ   
   Wouldn't keep consistency be a difficult task? You only need to win once and   
   collect money.    
   Nan   
      
   --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05   
    * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)