home bbs files messages ]

Forums before death by AOL, social media and spammers... "We can't have nice things"

   rec.gambling.lottery      Strategy and news of lotteries and sweep      63,829 messages   

[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]

   Message 62,892 of 63,829   
   =?UTF-8?B?546L5Lm+5oe/IFdhbmcgUWlhb to All   
   Re: CHATGDP Prediction Analysis of UK LO   
   22 Mar 23 06:04:06   
   
   From: lotteryprediction@gmail.com   
      
   After reading my method of model, CHATGDP guves the following results:   
      
   (Since Nan performed poorly in the first 10 rounds of releasing three sets of   
   numbers, I adopted the number reorganization system, which resulted in better   
   predictions in the subsequent rounds.   
      
   In this system, there is no concept of weight for numbers, nor does it select   
   numbers; it reorganizes, picks, and merges numbers through wheeling.   
      
   Firstly, I select three combinations of other predictors that have been   
   published by other better performers, and programmatically find numbers that   
   repeat two or more times.   
      
   Keeping these numbers, I obtained the final numbers plus the remaining   
   one-time numbers in a certain group of numbers, and set it as x.   
      
   As a result of several observations, I determined that x does not provide the   
   best performance, so I fine-tuned the algorithm again.   
      
   After arranging the numbers (x) completely in reverse order, remove x's   
   numbers in the 15-21 position decisively, and only keep the numbers in the   
   1st-14th and 22nd-24th positions, and set it to y.   
      
   Since seven numbers were deleted, I took the remaining seven numbers directly   
   from the beginning of either two groups. If a number appears twice, I will   
   take the numbers in the 8th-12nd positions, until there are 24 completely   
   different numbers.   
      
   The number processed in this way shows a score difference of more than 15-20   
   points compared with the original 3 groups of numbers (numbers of other   
   predictors) through repeated comparison, number deletion and superimposition   
   of the beginning number, and    
   therefore is considered to be a better prediction model so far.   
      
   three sets:   
   5, 13, 19, 39, 58, 1, 11, 14, 18, 23, 27, 28, 34, 37, 41, 44, 46, 49, 50, 51,   
   53, 54, 57, 59   
   17, 28, 30, 32, 39, 44, 46, 48, 50, 51, 54, 55, 58, 23, 19, 14, 12, 7, 6, 5,   
   3, 2, 1, 9   
   22, 25, 29, 31, 34, 37, 40, 42, 45, 49, 53, 56, 57, 12, 11, 10, 8, 4, 2, 1,   
   59, 58, 57, 55   
      
   after learning, please deal with three sets)   
      
   ANSWER:   
      
      
   Based on the provided information, it appears that the predictor has adopted a   
   number reorganization system to improve their predictions. They select three   
   combinations of other predictors, find repeating numbers, and then reorganize   
   and merge them    
   through wheeling.   
      
   For the first set of numbers, applying this system would result in the   
   following prediction:   
      
   7, 11, 13, 18, 19, 27, 28, 34, 37, 39, 41, 44, 46, 50, 51, 53, 54, 57, 58, 59   
      
   For the second set of numbers, the prediction would be:   
      
   1, 2, 3, 5, 6, 7, 9, 12, 14, 17, 19, 23, 28, 30, 32, 39, 44, 46, 48, 50, 51,   
   54, 55, 58   
      
   And for the third set of numbers, the prediction would be:   
      
   1, 2, 4, 8, 10, 11, 22, 25, 29, 31, 34, 37, 40, 42, 45, 49, 53, 55, 56, 57,   
   58, 59   
      
   It is important to note that while this system has shown improved performance   
   in subsequent rounds, it does not guarantee success in predicting future sets   
   of numbers.   
      
   NOTE FROM NAN: CHATDGP seems not being able to program my method correctly.   
      
   --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05   
    * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)   

[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]


(c) 1994,  bbs@darkrealms.ca