Forums before death by AOL, social media and spammers... "We can't have nice things"
|    rec.gambling.lottery    |    Strategy and news of lotteries and sweep    |    63,829 messages    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
|    Message 62,892 of 63,829    |
|    =?UTF-8?B?546L5Lm+5oe/IFdhbmcgUWlhb to All    |
|    Re: CHATGDP Prediction Analysis of UK LO    |
|    22 Mar 23 06:04:06    |
      From: lotteryprediction@gmail.com              After reading my method of model, CHATGDP guves the following results:              (Since Nan performed poorly in the first 10 rounds of releasing three sets of       numbers, I adopted the number reorganization system, which resulted in better       predictions in the subsequent rounds.              In this system, there is no concept of weight for numbers, nor does it select       numbers; it reorganizes, picks, and merges numbers through wheeling.              Firstly, I select three combinations of other predictors that have been       published by other better performers, and programmatically find numbers that       repeat two or more times.              Keeping these numbers, I obtained the final numbers plus the remaining       one-time numbers in a certain group of numbers, and set it as x.              As a result of several observations, I determined that x does not provide the       best performance, so I fine-tuned the algorithm again.              After arranging the numbers (x) completely in reverse order, remove x's       numbers in the 15-21 position decisively, and only keep the numbers in the       1st-14th and 22nd-24th positions, and set it to y.              Since seven numbers were deleted, I took the remaining seven numbers directly       from the beginning of either two groups. If a number appears twice, I will       take the numbers in the 8th-12nd positions, until there are 24 completely       different numbers.              The number processed in this way shows a score difference of more than 15-20       points compared with the original 3 groups of numbers (numbers of other       predictors) through repeated comparison, number deletion and superimposition       of the beginning number, and        therefore is considered to be a better prediction model so far.              three sets:       5, 13, 19, 39, 58, 1, 11, 14, 18, 23, 27, 28, 34, 37, 41, 44, 46, 49, 50, 51,       53, 54, 57, 59       17, 28, 30, 32, 39, 44, 46, 48, 50, 51, 54, 55, 58, 23, 19, 14, 12, 7, 6, 5,       3, 2, 1, 9       22, 25, 29, 31, 34, 37, 40, 42, 45, 49, 53, 56, 57, 12, 11, 10, 8, 4, 2, 1,       59, 58, 57, 55              after learning, please deal with three sets)              ANSWER:                     Based on the provided information, it appears that the predictor has adopted a       number reorganization system to improve their predictions. They select three       combinations of other predictors, find repeating numbers, and then reorganize       and merge them        through wheeling.              For the first set of numbers, applying this system would result in the       following prediction:              7, 11, 13, 18, 19, 27, 28, 34, 37, 39, 41, 44, 46, 50, 51, 53, 54, 57, 58, 59              For the second set of numbers, the prediction would be:              1, 2, 3, 5, 6, 7, 9, 12, 14, 17, 19, 23, 28, 30, 32, 39, 44, 46, 48, 50, 51,       54, 55, 58              And for the third set of numbers, the prediction would be:              1, 2, 4, 8, 10, 11, 22, 25, 29, 31, 34, 37, 40, 42, 45, 49, 53, 55, 56, 57,       58, 59              It is important to note that while this system has shown improved performance       in subsequent rounds, it does not guarantee success in predicting future sets       of numbers.              NOTE FROM NAN: CHATDGP seems not being able to program my method correctly.              --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05        * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
(c) 1994, bbs@darkrealms.ca