Forums before death by AOL, social media and spammers... "We can't have nice things"
|    rec.gambling.lottery    |    Strategy and news of lotteries and sweep    |    63,804 messages    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
|    Message 62,894 of 63,804    |
|    =?UTF-8?B?546L5Lm+5oe/IFdhbmcgUWlhb to All    |
|    Re: CHATGDP Prediction Analysis of UK LO    |
|    22 Mar 23 19:04:13    |
      From: lotteryprediction@gmail.com              Winning Numbers: 5 27 33 37 42 58       Calculate the scores for each number by counting the first number as 24 points       and the last number as 1 point.       Evaluate the following sets of numbers:       Summary:        CHATGDP A: 5*, 13, 19, 39, 58*, 1, 11, 14, 18, 23, 27*, 28, 34, 37*, 41, 44,       46, 49, 50, 51, 53, 54, 57, 59        CHATGDP A is the first AI recommended result based on past 50 drawings in       original order for learning material on ChatGDP V4 JAIL BREAKING, and performs       the best so far, and is taken into future account.       Score: 24+20+14+11=69       B AND C are obtained from CHATGDP too but it has been obtained with an unclear       instruction, thus we obtain a lower score.       CHATGDP B: 17, 28, 30, 32, 39, 44, 46, 48, 50, 51, 54, 55, 58*, 23, 19, 14,       12, 7, 6, 5*, 3, 2, 1, 9        5+12=17       CHATGDP C: 22, 25, 29, 31, 34, 37*, 40, 42*, 45, 49, 53, 56, 57, 12, 11, 10,       8, 4, 2, 1, 59, 58*, 57, 55       19+17+3=39       MODIFIED VERSION is the enhanced version based on human adjustment, which is       to be tested and the result is as follows:       CHATGDP A MODIFIED: 7, 11, 13, 18, 19, 27*, 28, 34, 37*, 39, 41, 44, 46, 50,       51, 53, 54, 57, 58*, 59        Score: 19+16+6=41       The modified version is weaker than its own generated version, implying the       method has not been proven effective. Also, it indicates that a superior set       requires less adjustment of its number weight factors, which is worth       re-considerations in the        application of prediction!        CHATGDP B MODIFIED: 1, 2, 3, 5*, 6, 7, 9, 12, 14, 17, 19, 23, 28, 30, 32, 39,       44, 46, 48, 50, 51, 54, 55, 58*        score: 21+1=22       CHATGDP C MODIFIED: 1, 2, 4, 8, 10, 11, 22, 25, 29, 31, 34, 37*, 40, 42*, 45,       49, 53, 55, 56, 57, 58*, 59       score: 2+9+11=22       JEREMO:        31, 53, 37*, 23, 11, 29, 2, 43, 19, 5*, 59, 41, 50, 47, 7, 3, 17, 13, 46, 59,       43, 19, 11, 53        Score: 22+15=37       JEREMO is proven to be the most effective method so far. Despite this, it has       the disadvantage of selecting two few numbers, which requires to be improved       with human assistance.       Nan: 13 59 2 12 55 53 54 49 51 23 50 14 46 11 5* 57 1 58* 17 22 44 41 37* 34        Score: 2+7+10=19       Leela: 17 59 2 12 55 53 54 49 51 23 50 14 46 11 5* 57 1 58* 22 13 9 3 6 7 19        Score: 8+11=19       AZ: 22 59 2 12 55 53 54 49 51 23 50 14 46 11 5* 57 1 58* 13 17 4 8 10 56       score: 7+10=17       Failure of re-processing chatGDP is mainly due to the fact that all three sets       are generated from one machine, and the diversification advantage is lost. It       is therefore suggested that when selecting input parameters, different sources       with low relevance        should be prioritized.              Nan              --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05        * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
(c) 1994, bbs@darkrealms.ca