Forums before death by AOL, social media and spammers... "We can't have nice things"
|    rec.gambling.lottery    |    Strategy and news of lotteries and sweep    |    63,804 messages    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
|    Message 63,038 of 63,804    |
|    Marmaduke Jinks to nigel    |
|    Re: Euromillions 12th March    |
|    12 Mar 24 21:16:25    |
      From: marmadukejinks99@gmail.com              On 12/03/2024 16:13, nigel wrote:       > 1,7,11,24,26,30,34,35,49.       >       > Stupid question but is there a formal definition of 'decade' in the       > context of lotteries? Is it 1-9 or 1-10 for example? My numbers above       > are the dregs where two different underpergorming 'decade' systems       > disagree.       >       I always presumed it to be dependent on the first "tens" number. so 1       would be in the 0 decade. 11 in the 1 decade etc etc.              I've not followed the decades but the "units" number I have followed.       My spreadsheet says 64% of the time there are two numbers (at least)       with the same family end digit like 11 or 21.              But that's not really high enough for the Euro. No main pair of no's       (66%), one number wholly divisible by 5 (69%) or wholly divisible by 3       (86%!) score better.              MJ       Now underpergorming - I'm thinking that's a Cate Middleton type of word ;-)              --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05        * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
(c) 1994, bbs@darkrealms.ca