From: marmadukejinks99@gmail.com   
      
   On 14/03/2024 12:50, nigel wrote:   
   > Marmaduke Jinks wrote:   
   >   
   >> On 13/03/2024 13:18, nigel wrote:   
   >>   
   >   
   >>  > So 10 would be in the 1 decade?   
   >> That's what I am thinking.  But I'm not a huge fan of decades.   
   >>   
   >> MJ   
   >>   
   >   
   > It just seems a little odd compared to chronological decades. For   
   > example, the 2000's started in 2001 etc.   
   >   
   > I'm also wondering about the wisdom of using anthropocentric measurement   
   > criteria. Perhaps using the approximate square root of the number of   
   > balls might be better, so 6/49 would use 7 and 6/59 would use 8. But   
   > then, should the number of balls drawn also count?   
   >   
   Do you know we talk about that all the time down the pub ;-)   
      
   Does someone like Gail Howard have a definition?   
      
   MJ   
      
   --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05   
    * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)