From: marmadukejinks99@gmail.com   
      
   On 09/09/2024 18:56, Marmaduke Jinks wrote:   
   > On 08/09/2024 13:07, nigel wrote:   
   >> Marmaduke Jinks wrote:   
   >>   
   >>> On 04/09/2024 14:56, Marmaduke Jinks wrote:   
   >>>   
   >>>> On 04/09/2024 14:51, Marmaduke Jinks wrote:   
   >>>>   
   >>>>> I've been thinking about this for sometime because it's based   
   >>>>> around my groupings of numbers into Prime and Fibonacci numbers,   
   >>>>> then 3s and 5s. There's a set that they resolve to of 39 numbers.   
   >>>>> These seem to pick up 4 and 5 of the drawn numbers most of the time   
   >>>>> 70%   
   >>>>>   
   >>>>> So let's break it down to something like a Hot Picks entry   
   >>>>>   
   >>>>> A   
   >>>>> 1 from   
   >>>>> {4, 14, 16, 22, 26, 28, 32, 44, 46, 49}   
   >>>>> this being the set not in the above groups - 11   
   >>>>>   
   >>>>> B   
   >>>>> 1 from   
   >>>>> {5, 10, 15, 20, 25, 30, 35, 45, 50}   
   >>>>> this being the set of 5s - 10 in all - a "5" occurs 69% of the time   
   >>>>>   
   >>>>> C   
   >>>>> 2 from   
   >>>>> {3, 6, 9, 12, 15, 18, 21, 24, 27, 30, 33, 36, 39, 42, 45}   
   >>>>> this being the set of 3s - 16 - 2 or more 3s occur 51% of the time   
   >>>>> - low :(   
   >>>>>   
   >>>>> D   
   >>>>> 2 from   
   >>>>> {1, 2, 3, 5, 7, 8, 11, 13, 17, 19, 21, 23, 29, 31, 34, 41, 43, 47}   
   >>>>> this being the set of Primes and Fibonaccis - 19 -  65% of the time   
   >>>>> - still low.   
   >>>>>   
   >>>>> I like the chances of A&B's.  They may be an educated way of   
   >>>>> splitting C&D up for doing Hotpicks.   
   >>>>>   
   >>>>> MJ   
   >>>>>   
   >>>> A produced no 16 last time   
   >>>> B produced no 45 last time   
   >>>> C gave us 9 and 45 - (not economic in Hotpicks)   
   >>>> D gave us 7 and 11 - (ditto)   
   >>>>   
   >>>> MJ   
   >>>>   
   >>>>   
   >>> A produced 14 this time   
   >>> B zilch   
   >>> C produced 12   
   >>> D produced 34, 41 and 47   
   >>>   
   >>> MJ   
   >>   
   >> D did well.   
   >>>   
   >>   
   > I think there may be some mileage in D but splitting the 3s (19 of them)   
   > from the PFs (22) still doesn't make them affordable as Hot Picks :-(   
   >   
   > MJ   
   >   
   I meant splitting the Primes (17) from the Fibonaccis (9).  I haven't   
   done any analysis on whether Primes would be good for a 2 from Hot Picks   
   exercise.  I suspect not.   
      
   --   
   This email has been checked for viruses by Avast antivirus software.   
   www.avast.com   
      
   --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05   
    * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)