Forums before death by AOL, social media and spammers... "We can't have nice things"
|    rec.games.trivia    |    Discussion about trivia games    |    32,813 messages    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
|    Message 30,895 of 32,813    |
|    Erland Sommarskog to Mark Brader    |
|    Re: RQFTCIFFF12 Game 9, Rounds 9-10 answ    |
|    27 Mar 22 11:47:36    |
      From: esquel@sommarskog.se              Mark Brader (msb@vex.net) writes:       > This was not only the longest but also the hardest round in the       > original game... an unpleasant combination. Oh well, these things       > happen.              Indeed. I thought this would be easy, since this is my strong       point, but many of the questions were quite thin on leads despite       the wordiness. For instance:              >> 2. Great Britain formally acquired possession of it in 1814.       >> It staunchly supported the UK through both World Wars, and       >> remained in the Commonwealth on becoming independent in 1964.       >> A decade later it became a republic. Since about the mid-1980s,       >> it has transformed itself into a freight transshipment point,       >> a financial center, and a tourist destination. It became an       >> EU member in May 2004 and adopted the euro in 2008.       >       > Malta. 4 for Dan Blum, Joshua, and Dan Tilque.              I knew that this must be Cyprus or Malta. I settled for Cyprus,       because Cyprus-registered freighters and tankers are not unheard of.       And for Malta I would have expected some reference to betting, as       many betting-related companies are based here. This is not intended       as a protest, just a comment on how difficult the round was.                     >> B2. This noble gas, atomic number 86, """is""" the heaviest       >> of the noble gases. It """is""" the only gas that only       >> has radioactive isotopes, and is considered a health hazard       >> due to its radioactivity.       >       > 2012 answer: radon. 2022 answer: oganesson (see below). 4 for       > everyone -- Erland, Dan Blum, Joshua, Dan Tilque, and Pete.       >       > Oganesson has atomic number 118, and is likewise always radioactive.       > No doubt it *would* therefore likewise be a health hazard if there       > was enough of it around to affect anyone, but only a few atoms of       > it have ever been made.              To be picky the 2022 answer is still radon, since the question specified the       atommic number.              As for the "is", I guess that depends if there exists any oganesson in       the very moment you speak.              --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05        * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
(c) 1994, bbs@darkrealms.ca