From: weaponx013@yahoo.com   
      
   Scott H wrote:   
   >>   
   >> Hmmmm, I don't know what it could be. I've looked at them on two PCs   
   >> now and at 100% they both look like early PS2 games with hardcore   
   >> jaggies going on. I'll try to take a screenshot and post it in the   
   >> forums, see if it's anything like what you're getting. Maybe I''ve   
   >> screwed up a codec setting? Oddly enough, the RE4 stuff looks alright   
   >> at 100%, still a little jaggy, but I think that's just looking at the   
   >> game on a monitor vs. an SDTV.   
   >   
   > Hmm, maybe so.  Even at full screen the REC:V videos don't look   
   > abnormally jagged to me (I can see more edges in RE4 actually).  I can   
   > see more compression artifacts in the REC:V videos at 200% and higher   
   > though, is that possibly what you're seeing?  It looks like large pixels   
   > on most objects, but it shouldn't be visible at 100%.  I've tested them   
   > on my 19inch VGA monitor and my wife's 15.5inch LCD laptop screen.   
   >   
      
         That's not to say that there isn't plenty of aliasing to be seen   
   in both versions, and the video files do capture this accurately.  The   
   PS2 version in particular, when Claire is in front of the spot light   
   scrambling away from the machine gun fire, her whole body is outlined by   
   jaggies.  Pretty much whenever anything is in front of a light   
   background on a PS2 game the aliasing is exaggerated (just see VF4 vs   
   VF4 evo).  The rest of the time though, things look fairly smooth as is   
   the case with the facial close ups, and diagonal background objects not   
   being significantly aliased.   
      
   --   
   Scott   
      
   http://www.gamepilgrimage.com   
      
   --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05   
    * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)