From: bel@whipassgaming.com   
      
   >> Well, first off, YouTube is shitty, shitty, Flash-based video so you're   
   >> not getting the entire picture. Then, you also haven't actually played   
   >> it to try out the actual gameplay. Both are pretty poor. Why they didn't   
   >> try to just do Alpha 1 instead, I'll never know...   
   >   
   > You know thats a good point.  To me, while its somewhat of a graphical   
   > improvement, SFA1 is not that much better looking than SF2 IMHO.  I   
   > think they could have made a better port of it for the SNES thats for   
   > sure.   
      
   Well, SFA1 is just a much smaller game too. I mean, there are, what, 8   
   characters...three of which are pretty much just palette swaps? Just   
   makes more sense, on a cart, to attempt the smaller of the two games.   
   Your chances of pulling off a more accurate conversion is greatly   
   increased. ;)   
      
   > But I really don't like SFA1's gameplay in comparison to SFA2   
   > and 3 through, those are really good.   
      
    From what I've read, SFA1 was more of a test than anything else. They   
   wanted to see if the public was ready to go for a more combo-happy   
   Street Fighter. This definitely explains why the character roster was so   
   amazingly small, and there were only like, what, 4 or 5 backgrounds?   
      
   Still, I agree with you, I like the way SFA2 plays more than SFA1(though   
   I don't mind the chains, to tell you the truth, it was a nice change of   
   pace). SFA3 just makes me sick to my stomach....   
      
   BTW, expect a PM via the forums here in a bit....the sale has begun. ;)   
      
   Bel   
   --   
   Whip Ass Gaming: http://www.whipassgaming.com/   
      
   "Time flies when you're kicking ass!"   
     - Duke in Duke Nukem: Time to Kill   
      
   --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05   
    * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)