XPost: rec.games.video.classic, rec.games.video.nintendo   
   From: starsabre@net.att   
      
   In article ,   
    "Sonic the Hedgehog" wrote:   
      
   > X No Archive:yes   
      
   Anotehr worthless shit wanting his comments hidden from the future. His   
   entire message is thus quoted to thwart that plan.   
      
   > C'mon, the NES was technically inferior to a Commodore 64 !   
      
   Agreed.   
      
   > The Sega Master system was so much better. Even the ATARI   
   > 7800 was soooo much better than the NES.   
      
   SMS - about the same, all in all. 7800, graphically and accoustically   
   superior, memory structure inferior.   
      
   > The NES' success can only be explained by Nintendo's ruthless   
   > policy, not by its quality.   
      
   No, by its agressive and successful marketing.   
      
   > NES games suck. Crappy graphics, terrible sound.Remember   
   > the SID in the C64 which was even present in the old Commodore   
   > 6xx machines, long before the NES. Heck, even ATARI's ancient   
   > POKEY is much better than the NES' soundchip.   
      
   But there were a lot more games for the NES, and among those were   
   several very fun games. I have over 120 games I really enjoy on the   
   NES, which is more than the total library of the 7800, and I think more   
   than the SMS total library, but I am not entirely sure on that.   
      
   > And let's not talk about the flickering sprites.   
      
   C=64 had some games with flickering sprites, as did SMS.   
      
   > The NES was crap. Period.   
      
   No, the NES had is place, and I still enjoy many of its games.   
      
   Your post is crap, which is why you wanted it not archived.   
      
   jt   
      
   --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05   
    * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)   
|