From: weaponx013@yahoo.com   
      
   Dr. Luveno wrote:   
   > Scott H wrote:   
   >> The ever-present post-modern method of dodging the bullet.  ;)  Do you   
   >> really find the PSP screen less blurry in motion than the Nomad's?   
   >   
   > Absolutely - the PSP's screen is actually one of its strongest   
   > qualities.  The Nomad screen is a blurry mess, even compared to its   
   > contemporaries like the Turbo Express (much less a modern device like   
   > the PSP).  That, with the expanded portability and battery life, plus   
   > the SNES, PS1, MAME, and native PSP features (games, movies, music, web   
   > browser, etc.) all loaded onto a single tiny Memory Stick make the   
   > decision a no-brainer for me.  Emulation is spot-on and save state   
   > features make it that much better when gaming on the go.   
      
   Right, no doubt the PSP is more versatile.  The Nomad came out in a day   
   where versatility in a game console was practically looked down upon, as   
   was the price tag.  I'm just surprised at your observation of the   
   screen's quality.  My experience, and every comment I have seen up until   
   now about the Nomad's screen is that it exemplifies Genesis graphic.   
   Plus, I haven't even gotten in to the differences in controls between   
   the Nomad and PSP.   
      
   > But I ain't going to besmearch anyone for digging their Nomad.  As   
   > mentioned earlier, it is a great conversation piece - but time has   
   > passed it by for me.  I'm glad you enjoy yours.   
      
         I'm mainly pointing to actual advantages that I think the Nomad   
   has over the PSP for playing Genesis games.  Clearly the PSP would win   
   in an overall sense, but I have never seen emulation match the actual   
   hardware 100%.   
      
   -   
   Scott   
      
   --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05   
    * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)