From: goodsoldierschweik@invalid.com   
      
   On Sun, 31 Jan 2010 21:36:02 -0700, "Sheldon"   
    wrote:   
      
   >   
   >"Chilla"  wrote in message   
   >news:4b5ba949$0$1779$afc38c87@news.optusnet.com.au...   
   >> Greg Wormald wrote:   
   >>> The particular stones matter a lot less than the skill and care of the   
   >>> sharpener.   
   >>>   
   >>> If it is a real Viking sword then almost anything you do to it will   
   >>> decrease it's value.   
   >>>   
   >>> If it's a cheap fake then it probably won't sharpen.   
   >>>   
   >>> If it's an expensive fake then I would practice on some old carving   
   >>> knives first.   
   >>>   
   >>> Greg   
   >>   
   >> I'll agree with Greg here, if you sharpen a real artifact, I'll personally   
   >> fly to you and kick you up the date (trans: date = bum = arse = ass).   
   >>   
   >> If it's a re-enactor blade, it shouldn't be sharp, as historically swords   
   >> of that period weren't that sharp.   
   >>   
   >> If it's for posing value, and it didn't cost much then it's not going to   
   >> matter if you sharpen it and ruin it.   
   >>   
   >>   
   >> Regards Charles   
   >>   
   >   
   >Here's another vote for leaving it alone, assuming it's the real deal.  And   
   >why do you need to sharpen it?  Planning on going on a crusade or something?   
   >Keep the real one for display and get a "good" replica and sharpen the heck   
   >out of it.   
   >   
      
      
   Does one carry a "replica" on crusade ?-)   
      
   Cheers,   
      
   Schweik   
   (goodsoldierschweikatgmaildotcom)   
      
   --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05   
    * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)