From: goodsoldierschweik@invalid.com   
      
   On Fri, 25 Mar 2011 00:15:51 +1100, Krypsis    
   wrote:   
      
   >On 24/03/2011 10:59 AM, Benayahu Leipowitscz wrote:   
   >> On Mar 22, 8:32 am, Benayahu Leipowitscz  wrote:   
   >>   
   >>   
   >> Well unfortunate the replies to the ? I raised have shown little   
   >> intelligence or insight. Just about what I expected afraid to say. I   
   >> was hoping that instead of the hate-fill replies which is common here   
   >> in this NG, someone might have the skills/courage to post a reply   
   >> which contained possibly a little bit of critical thinking to analyze   
   >> this phenomena. Sadly, not the case.   
   >   
   >The only people posting in this newsgroup these days are the trolls to   
   >whom you are responding. They are not worth the effort and, as you might   
   >have observed, every other (former) poster seems also the think the   
   >same. So what you have, in effect, are trolls posting and replying to   
   >trolls. It's a form of mutual masturbation and they are very good at it!   
   >   
   >>   
   >> For my two cent worth, even though I have not study psychology as   
   >> such, in my undergraduate degree I did take some unit that had a   
   >> psychological focus ,and particular, I very much enjoyed discussing   
   >> Sigmund Freud, the master many believe. Of particular interest to the   
   >> question i have raised here, some of you may very well be aware that   
   >> one of Freud's theory related to different stages of development in   
   >> the human being. From baby until death, Freud believe that individuals   
   >> go through varying stages of growth, particular mental growth. To   
   >   
   >The trolls never graduated from "infantile". Freud's theories then don't   
   >work for everyone!   
   >   
   >> continue, in the early stages of childhood, we go through one stage   
   >> that is call the 'Anal Stage'. Ok, it sounds funny, but if you care to   
   >> do a bit of reading into this matter, you will see that it fact does   
   >> make some sense. Unfortunate, some people have troubles passing this   
   >> anal stage of cognitive development.   
   >   
   >These people still crap and piss in their pants. Note the pic of Robert   
   >Johnson being arrested for publicly pissing his pants. Or maybe he   
   >pissed his pant because he was arrested. It makes little difference.   
   >Bladder control isn't his strong point.   
   >>   
   >> I think this is very interesting and judgeing by some of the replies   
   >> on this NG (which many refer to colon, backsides and the like) I think   
   >> it is quite reasonable to assume that some of the posters here on the   
   >> NG have in fact not past the anal stage of development. Sad really for   
   >> grown men but seems it is a fact of life for some to cope with.   
   >>   
   >> Thoughts???   
   >>   
   >> Maven   
   >   
   >These trolls have extremely infantile minds and you would make better   
   >use of your time by ignoring them. They have succeeded in turning   
   >Rec.Knives and Soc.culture.Thai into discussion wastelands. They tried   
   >it on rec.food.cooking but were run out of that discussion group on a   
   >rail. RFC has a large group of women posting so that explains why the   
   >trolls failed. You see, they have undeveloped social skills, especially   
   >those pertaining to the fair sex. This is particularly apparent with   
   >larbgai who has to "buy" his women's time by the hour as evidenced by a   
   >photo freely available on the net where he is seen posing with a Thai   
   >lady of the night. Larbgai is proud of his limited skills with the fair   
   >sex as he posted the picture on the net himself.   
   >Kop's approach is a little different. He is far too busy playing with   
   >his gun to even be interested in the fair sex. He posted a pic of   
   >himself holding his "gun" and that too is freely available on the net.   
   >Kop did attempt to retract the pic when he realised he'd attract the   
   >attention of the Feds but, unfortunately for him, it had gone viral and   
   >is now available in many other locations. He "thinks" he is travelling   
   >to Thailand courtesy of the US Military but that is just another one of   
   >his many fantasies. He says he will be taking his "gun" but I suspect he   
   >only wants to use it on ladyboys. It's a pity that the US won't even let   
   >him out of the country. They're a bit concerned over all these people in   
   >recent times playing with their guns in public places.   
   >Then there's Robert Johnson, a sad case if ever I saw one. He isn't out   
   >of his drunken stupor long enough to even remember what "his gun" is   
   >used for with the exception of draining his person of the alcoholic   
   >fluids. Pity is that he no longer has bladder control so tends to have   
   >accidents at the slightest stress events. Wouldn't want to be seen with   
   >him in a public place! It could be embarrassing as the wet patch spreads   
   >across the front of his pants. There's a photo, again freely available   
   >on the internet, of that happening whilst he was being arrested for   
   >being drunk and disorderly in a public place! He's also not shy about   
   >being a social misfit as he posted the pic himself.   
   >   
   >So, in summary, these aren't "grown men" that you are dealing with here.   
   >You can make much better use of your time doing just about anything else   
   >and don't hold your breath waiting for kop to turn up in Chiang Mai.   
   >You've got more chance of bumping your arse against the moon than you   
   >have of seeing kop anywhere outside of the US.   
   >   
   >Krypsis   
   >   
      
   Yes Crispy, as you say "The only people posting in this newsgroup   
   these days are the trolls".   
      
   Welcome to the club.   
   Cheers,   
      
   Schweik   
   (goodsoldierschweikatgmail)   
      
   --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05   
    * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)