From: goodsoldierschweik@invalid.com   
      
   On Wed, 04 May 2011 19:27:19 +1000, Krypsis    
   wrote:   
      
   >On 4/05/2011 4:22 PM, Schweik wrote:   
   >> On Tue, 3 May 2011 16:02:43 -0700 (PDT), LarbGai   
   >> wrote:   
   >>   
   >>> On May 4, 4:21 am, rigger  wrote:   
   >>>   
   >>>>> *******It's interesting  watching these two pathetic old farts trying   
   >>>>> to out grizzle each other about someone the don't know, have never met   
   >>>>> and are patently jealous of, someone living a lifestyle they can only   
   >>>>> dream about.   
   >>>>> I hope when I get as old as them I won't have to broadcast my envies   
   >>>>> and failures to the world.   
   >>>>> Keep it up DennisMc and Krypto, we feel sorry for you.   
   >>>>   
   >>>> Reminds me of "Dueling Banjos"; cracks me up.   
   >>>>   
   >>>> dennis   
   >>>> in nca   
   >>>   
   >>> **** Exactly. Both of the old farts trying to do each other with their   
   >>> hatred of someone whose lifestyle they can only dream about.   
   >>> The endless reply  from the old fool Krypsis proves my point beyond   
   >>> all doubt.   
   >>> I actually believe he thinks someone gives a stuff.   
   >>   
   >>   
   >> But of course someone does give a stuff. He does. He is displaying his   
   >> eminence and superiority to the unwashed masses.   
   >>   
   >> Out of curiosity, has anyone ever seen an original Krispy post that   
   >> displayed even a mediocre knowledge of anything? Or only his constant   
   >> carping about people who, apparently, are living a better life then a   
   >> 73 year old misanthrope who can't afford to retire.   
   >>   
   >> Cheers,   
   >>   
   >> Schweik   
   >> (goodsoldierschweikatgmail)   
   >   
   >Retirement is for people who cannot cope. I could have retired at 55   
   >but, since I enjoy my work, why should I? I've cut down my working week   
   >to 2 - 3 days and, if I find myself no longer getting enjoyment from it,   
   >I'll go and find some alternative to keep me occupied. I sure as hell   
   >don't envy you your lifestyle. I'd rather be here with my extended   
   >family. If you're living a better life Schweik, then it sure doesn't   
   >look like that from here. The ONLY reason you're living in Thailand is   
   >to eke out your pension a little further. You could only afford a   
   >miserable existence back in the US. Your problem is that you aren't   
   >living "in" Thailand. Rather, you're living on top of it in a   
   >parasitical manner. You don't mingle with Thais nor do you speak, read   
   >or write the language. In short, you look down on the Thai people and it   
   >comes out clearly in your scribblings on SCT.   
   >   
   >Krypsis   
      
   Gee Krispy, but you are developing a penchant for being wrong.   
      
   I don't have a pension, I invested my hard earned salary and now have   
   sufficient funds to live out my life as I care to.   
      
   But to get back to the original point, that you are a liar, would you   
   like to, perhaps, offer some for your remarks - for example, I'm   
   living on, not in Thailand; that I don't have sufficient funds to live   
   where I wish to, and so on.   
      
   After all you don't know me, never met me, don't know anyone who knows   
   me. It is all your overheated imagination and in this case it is   
   libel, or in the vernacular, a bunch of rubbish; lies. Yes I know, you   
   are hiding behind your secret name and undoubtedly believe that nobody   
   can find you and as a result parade yourself as a brave man when in   
   fact you are just a wee quivering beasty, as R. Burns had it.   
   Cheers,   
      
   Schweik   
   (goodsoldierschweikatgmail)   
      
   --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05   
    * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)