From: krypsis@optusnet.com.au   
      
   On 10/05/2011 9:17 PM, goodsoldierschweik@gmail.com wrote:   
   > On Tue, 10 May 2011 17:07:45 +1000, Krypsis   
   > wrote:   
   >   
   >> On 10/05/2011 10:51 AM, goodsoldierschweik@gmail.com wrote:   
   >>> On Tue, 10 May 2011 07:39:58 +0900, DennisMc   
   >>> wrote:   
   >>>   
   >>>> On 5/10/2011 2:58 AM, rigger wrote:   
   >>>>> On May 8, 5:22 pm, DennisMc    wrote:   
   >>>>>> On 5/9/2011 8:47 AM, goodsoldierschw...@gmail.com wrote:   
   >>>>>>   
   >>>>>>   
   >>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>>>>>     Yep, you certainly must have been a writer. Not.   
   >>>>>>>>>>>     Clue: The word is 'linguistic,' not 'lingual.'   
   >>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>>> lingual   \adj.: Of, relating to, or produced by the tongue.   
   >>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>>> Don't have this in your 4th grade dictionary?   
   >>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>>> See all the things you learn when you grow up.;)   
   >>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>>> Grow up!   
   >>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>>> dennis   
   >>>>>>>>> in nca   
   >>>>>>   
   >>>>>> Do you actually think you're fooling anyone?   
   >>>>>   
   >>>>> "Do you actually think you're fooling anyone?"   
   >>>>>   
   >>>>> That depends; do you think you're anyone?   
   >>>>>   
   >>>>> I don't think so, but then I'm not either.   
   >>>>>   
   >>>>> If I'm wrong please let me know.   
   >>>>>   
   >>>>> dennis   
   >>>>> in nca   
   >>>>   
   >>>> You're not wrong, rigger. You are just exhibiting the signs of a   
   >>>> behavior modified by being bullied.  You think 'if I'm nice and agree   
   >>>> with the bullies perhaps they will leave me alone.'   
   >>>> It's not uncommon. It's called 'Stockholm Syndrome.'   
   >>>   
   >>>   
   >>> You are wrong, you know.   
   >>>   
   >>> The Stockholm Syndrome is a recognized psychological phenomenon   
   >>> wherein prisoners express empathy have positive feelings towards their   
   >>> captors.   
   >>>   
   >>>   
   >>> The following are viewed as the conditions necessary for Stockholm   
   >>> syndrome to occur.   
   >>>   
   >>> Hostages who develop Stockholm syndrome often view the perpetrator as   
   >>> giving life by simply not taking it. In this sense, the captor becomes   
   >>> the person in control of the captive's basic needs for survival and   
   >>> the victim's life itself.   
   >>>   
   >>> The hostage endures isolation from other people and has only the   
   >>> captor's perspective available. Perpetrators routinely keep   
   >>> information about the outside world's response to their actions from   
   >>> captives to keep them totally dependent.   
   >>>   
   >>> The hostage taker threatens to kill the victim and gives the   
   >>> perception of having the capability to do so. The captive judges it   
   >>> safer to align with the perpetrator, endure the hardship of captivity,   
   >>> and comply with the captor than to resist and face death.   
   >>>   
   >>> The captive sees the perpetrator as showing some degree of kindness.   
   >>> Kindness serves as the cornerstone of Stockholm syndrome; the   
   >>> condition will not develop unless the captor exhibits it in some form   
   >>> toward the hostage.   
   >>>   
   >>> However, captives often misinterpret a lack of abuse as kindness and   
   >>> may develop feelings of appreciation for this perceived benevolence.   
   >>> If the captor is purely evil and abusive, the hostage will respond   
   >>> with hatred. But, if perpetrators show some kindness, victims will   
   >>> submerge the anger they feel in response to the terror and concentrate   
   >>> on the captor's good side to protect themselves.   
   >>>   
   >>>   
   >>> Note that none of the necessary conditions exist here so one can only   
   >>> assume that you don't know what you are talking about and are simply a   
   >>> stupid shit with access to a computer.   
   >>   
   >> How ironic! That is actually how I regard you! You couldn't have put my   
   >> assessment of you in finer or more accurate terms.   
   >>   
   >> Krypsis   
   >   
   > Ah Krispy, back from your sinecure already? We'd hardly had time to   
   > miss you.   
   >   
   > I certainly hope that your toils weren't too irksome, but God it must   
   > be soul destroying to be old and unable to support oneself and to have   
   > to be caging pints from one's erstwhile mates.   
      
   Caging?  I think you mean "cadging". Big difference.   
      
   Pray tell why I would need to be cadging anything from my mates?   
      
   I'm not the one who needs to live in retirement in a low cost country to   
   eke out my retirement pension. I leave that for you to do!   
      
   Krypsis   
      
   --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05   
    * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)