On Tue, 10 May 2011 22:08:48 +1000, Krypsis    
   wrote:   
      
   >On 10/05/2011 9:17 PM, goodsoldierschweik@gmail.com wrote:   
   >> On Tue, 10 May 2011 17:07:45 +1000, Krypsis   
   >> wrote:   
   >>   
   >>> On 10/05/2011 10:51 AM, goodsoldierschweik@gmail.com wrote:   
   >>>> On Tue, 10 May 2011 07:39:58 +0900, DennisMc   
   >>>> wrote:   
   >>>>   
   >>>>> On 5/10/2011 2:58 AM, rigger wrote:   
   >>>>>> On May 8, 5:22 pm, DennisMc    wrote:   
   >>>>>>> On 5/9/2011 8:47 AM, goodsoldierschw...@gmail.com wrote:   
   >>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>     Yep, you certainly must have been a writer. Not.   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>     Clue: The word is 'linguistic,' not 'lingual.'   
   >>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>>>> lingual   \adj.: Of, relating to, or produced by the tongue.   
   >>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>>>> Don't have this in your 4th grade dictionary?   
   >>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>>>> See all the things you learn when you grow up.;)   
   >>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>>>> Grow up!   
   >>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>>>> dennis   
   >>>>>>>>>> in nca   
   >>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>> Do you actually think you're fooling anyone?   
   >>>>>>   
   >>>>>> "Do you actually think you're fooling anyone?"   
   >>>>>>   
   >>>>>> That depends; do you think you're anyone?   
   >>>>>>   
   >>>>>> I don't think so, but then I'm not either.   
   >>>>>>   
   >>>>>> If I'm wrong please let me know.   
   >>>>>>   
   >>>>>> dennis   
   >>>>>> in nca   
   >>>>>   
   >>>>> You're not wrong, rigger. You are just exhibiting the signs of a   
   >>>>> behavior modified by being bullied.  You think 'if I'm nice and agree   
   >>>>> with the bullies perhaps they will leave me alone.'   
   >>>>> It's not uncommon. It's called 'Stockholm Syndrome.'   
   >>>>   
   >>>>   
   >>>> You are wrong, you know.   
   >>>>   
   >>>> The Stockholm Syndrome is a recognized psychological phenomenon   
   >>>> wherein prisoners express empathy have positive feelings towards their   
   >>>> captors.   
   >>>>   
   >>>>   
   >>>> The following are viewed as the conditions necessary for Stockholm   
   >>>> syndrome to occur.   
   >>>>   
   >>>> Hostages who develop Stockholm syndrome often view the perpetrator as   
   >>>> giving life by simply not taking it. In this sense, the captor becomes   
   >>>> the person in control of the captive's basic needs for survival and   
   >>>> the victim's life itself.   
   >>>>   
   >>>> The hostage endures isolation from other people and has only the   
   >>>> captor's perspective available. Perpetrators routinely keep   
   >>>> information about the outside world's response to their actions from   
   >>>> captives to keep them totally dependent.   
   >>>>   
   >>>> The hostage taker threatens to kill the victim and gives the   
   >>>> perception of having the capability to do so. The captive judges it   
   >>>> safer to align with the perpetrator, endure the hardship of captivity,   
   >>>> and comply with the captor than to resist and face death.   
   >>>>   
   >>>> The captive sees the perpetrator as showing some degree of kindness.   
   >>>> Kindness serves as the cornerstone of Stockholm syndrome; the   
   >>>> condition will not develop unless the captor exhibits it in some form   
   >>>> toward the hostage.   
   >>>>   
   >>>> However, captives often misinterpret a lack of abuse as kindness and   
   >>>> may develop feelings of appreciation for this perceived benevolence.   
   >>>> If the captor is purely evil and abusive, the hostage will respond   
   >>>> with hatred. But, if perpetrators show some kindness, victims will   
   >>>> submerge the anger they feel in response to the terror and concentrate   
   >>>> on the captor's good side to protect themselves.   
   >>>>   
   >>>>   
   >>>> Note that none of the necessary conditions exist here so one can only   
   >>>> assume that you don't know what you are talking about and are simply a   
   >>>> stupid shit with access to a computer.   
   >>>   
   >>> How ironic! That is actually how I regard you! You couldn't have put my   
   >>> assessment of you in finer or more accurate terms.   
   >>>   
   >>> Krypsis   
   >>   
   >> Ah Krispy, back from your sinecure already? We'd hardly had time to   
   >> miss you.   
   >>   
   >> I certainly hope that your toils weren't too irksome, but God it must   
   >> be soul destroying to be old and unable to support oneself and to have   
   >> to be caging pints from one's erstwhile mates.   
   >   
   >Caging?  I think you mean "cadging". Big difference.   
   >   
   >Pray tell why I would need to be cadging anything from my mates?   
   >   
   >I'm not the one who needs to live in retirement in a low cost country to   
   >eke out my retirement pension. I leave that for you to do!   
   >   
   >Krypsis   
      
      
   Ah Krispy, but you are the one brags about your mates finding him the   
   sinecure so that he could support his extended Vietnamese family (who   
   seem to have discovered nirvana with a Westerner to support them). You   
   are the one who brags about the two days a week.   
      
   And you have to ask about cadging from your mates?   
      
   But to set the record straight, I have no retirement. I simply live on   
   the income from my investments.   
      
   --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05   
    * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)