On Thu, 09 Jun 2011 09:33:48 +0900, DennisMc    
   wrote:   
      
   >On 6/9/2011 8:29 AM, goodsoldierschweik@gmail.com wrote:   
   >   
   >>   
   >> Another word from our vocabularially handicapped fellow...   
   >>   
   >> Cheers,   
   >>   
   >> Schweik   
   >   
   >Since you've taken the time to embarrass yourself yet again, allow me to   
   >help you along.   
   >   
   >There is no such word as 'vocabularially' in the English language. The   
   >easiest way for you to express what you were trying and failing to say   
   >would be "vocabulary challenged." Since you usually try to show people   
   >how smart you are (the word for that is "Magniloquent,")  there are   
   >several BIG words that would describe what you were 'trying' to say   
   >though. Use a dictionary next time and spare yourself being the butt of   
   >intellectual laughter, though you do this so damn well!  LOL!   
      
   Ah, a voice form the dunney. But to answer you specifically, don't you   
   feel it a bit ridiculous, having dreamed up the pseudonym "dennismc"   
   to castigate anyone else for making up words. Can you even pronounce   
   "dennismc"?   
      
   And, by the way, there is no such thing as a limit to the English   
   vocabulary. Anyone can use a new word when ever they want to. After   
   all you are the perfect example..... most people do not interject   
   "duh" into the conversation and you do, figuratively, on a continuous   
   basis.   
      
      
   Cheers,   
      
   Schweik   
      
   --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05   
    * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)