On Fri, 10 Jun 2011 11:14:06 +1000, Krypsis    
   wrote:   
      
   >On 10/06/2011 10:35 AM, goodsoldierschweik@gmail.com wrote:   
   >> On Thu, 09 Jun 2011 09:33:48 +0900, DennisMc   
   >> wrote:   
   >>   
   >>> On 6/9/2011 8:29 AM, goodsoldierschweik@gmail.com wrote:   
   >>>   
   >>>>   
   >>>> Another word from our vocabularially handicapped fellow...   
   >>>>   
   >>>> Cheers,   
   >>>>   
   >>>> Schweik   
   >>>   
   >>> Since you've taken the time to embarrass yourself yet again, allow me to   
   >>> help you along.   
   >>>   
   >>> There is no such word as 'vocabularially' in the English language. The   
   >>> easiest way for you to express what you were trying and failing to say   
   >>> would be "vocabulary challenged." Since you usually try to show people   
   >>> how smart you are (the word for that is "Magniloquent,")  there are   
   >>> several BIG words that would describe what you were 'trying' to say   
   >>> though. Use a dictionary next time and spare yourself being the butt of   
   >>> intellectual laughter, though you do this so damn well!  LOL!   
   >>   
   >> Ah, a voice form the dunney.   
   >   
   >"form"??     Must be a typographical error, eh?   
   >   
   >"Dunney"??   The word "Dunny" has no "E" before the "Y".   
   >   
      
   And of course you would know, wouldn't you. One assumes that with your   
   superior knowledge you frequent those sort of places. Tell us, does   
   the sight of other males urinating excite you to lust; or envy?   
   >   
   >> But to answer you specifically, don't you   
   >> feel it a bit ridiculous, having dreamed up the pseudonym "dennismc"   
   >> to castigate anyone else for making up words. Can you even pronounce   
   >> "dennismc"?   
   >   
   >A pseudonym is an alternative name and, as such, is not and is never   
   >meant to be a "word" as defined in a dictionary. It is a name, any name,   
   >even one entirely made up on the spur of the moment.   
   >   
   >You, on the other hand, are not using a pseudonym at all. You are using   
   >an incorrectly spelled word, no ifs, no buts, no wherefores!   
   >>   
   >> And, by the way, there is no such thing as a limit to the English   
   >> vocabulary.   
   >   
   >If it isn't in the Oxford English Dictionary II, the full and complete   
   >version, then it isn't English.   
   >   
   >It isn't even an Americanism.   
   >   
   >BTW, children make up words to compensate for their lack of vocabulary   
   >skills. You are a little too old for that caper, don't you think?   
   >   
   >> Anyone can use a new word when ever they want to.   
   >   
   >True, but that doesn't make the word an English word any more than   
   >living in Thailand makes you Thai.   
   >   
   >   
   >> After all you are the perfect example.....   
   > > most people do not interject "duh" into the conversation and you   
   > > do, figuratively, on a continuous basis.   
   >>   
   >Well, a lot of people DO interject "duh" into a conversation. As well,   
   >quite a few interject "duh" into written works. No surprise there!   
   >>   
   >> Cheers,   
   >>   
   >> Schweik   
   >   
   >Krypsis   
   Cheers,   
      
   Schweik   
      
   --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05   
    * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)