On Sat, 11 Jun 2011 09:41:08 +1000, Krypsis
wrote:
>On 11/06/2011 8:51 AM, goodsoldierschweik@gmail.com wrote:
>> On Fri, 10 Jun 2011 11:14:06 +1000, Krypsis
>> wrote:
>>
>>> On 10/06/2011 10:35 AM, goodsoldierschweik@gmail.com wrote:
>>>> On Thu, 09 Jun 2011 09:33:48 +0900, DennisMc
>>>> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> On 6/9/2011 8:29 AM, goodsoldierschweik@gmail.com wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Another word from our vocabularially handicapped fellow...
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Cheers,
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Schweik
>>>>>
>>>>> Since you've taken the time to embarrass yourself yet again, allow me to
>>>>> help you along.
>>>>>
>>>>> There is no such word as 'vocabularially' in the English language. The
>>>>> easiest way for you to express what you were trying and failing to say
>>>>> would be "vocabulary challenged." Since you usually try to show people
>>>>> how smart you are (the word for that is "Magniloquent,") there are
>>>>> several BIG words that would describe what you were 'trying' to say
>>>>> though. Use a dictionary next time and spare yourself being the butt of
>>>>> intellectual laughter, though you do this so damn well! LOL!
>>>>
>>>> Ah, a voice form the dunney.
>>>
>>> "form"?? Must be a typographical error, eh?
>>>
>>> "Dunney"?? The word "Dunny" has no "E" before the "Y".
>>>
>>
>> And of course you would know, wouldn't you. One assumes that with your
>> superior knowledge you frequent those sort of places. Tell us, does
>> the sight of other males urinating excite you to lust; or envy?
>>>
>It seems that you get your rocks off on such things. The concept hadn't
>even occurred to me.
>
>Krypsis
>
>
>
>
>
>>
>> Schweik
Oh Krispy how you lie. Everyone knows how you haunt the public
lavatories.... I only asked whether you were titillated or simply
jealous of the stream. A serious question to someone of your ilk to
answer.
Cheers,
Schweik
--- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
* Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)
|
