XPost: talk.politics.guns
From: me4guns@vcenturylink.removeme.this2.nospam.net
"slate_leeper" wrote in message
news:uf3toaddl589cqf1uqcsc2db5fprb3rnm0@4ax.com...
> On Fri, 26 Jun 2015 10:20:57 -0500, ĄJones wrote:
>
>>On Fri, 26 Jun 2015 08:07:32 -0400, in talk.politics.guns slate_leeper
>> wrote:
>>
>>>Now you have flipped your argument. "Other violent uses of guns"
>>>indeed. How about "other violent methods and tools that result in
>>>death." That is what you try to wash over when you talk about "gun
>>>murders" or "gun violence."
>>
>>May I remind you that this group is "talk.politics.guns"; why does it
>>seem to surprise you that people would discuss the politics of guns
>>here? If you want to discuss the violent uses of knives, why not try
>>rec.knives?
>>
>>Jones
>
>
> I understand. Death by any means other than firearm is not important,
> and does not count. We have heard this many times from those who wish
> to outlaw firearms.
Of course, because they don't care about the violence, injury or death.
That's simply their excuse. Their real concern is the instrumentality,
particularly those that will never be used illegally to result in violence,
injury or death against another person.
--- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
* Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)
|
