XPost: talk.politics.guns
From: me4guns@vcenturylink.removeme.this2.nospam.net
"RD Sandman" wrote in message
news:XnsA4C698701EF5EHopewell@216.166.97.131...
> "Scout" wrote in
> news:mmn4uo$5id$1@dont-email.me:
>
>>
>>
>> "slate_leeper" wrote in message
>> news:uf3toaddl589cqf1uqcsc2db5fprb3rnm0@4ax.com...
>>> On Fri, 26 Jun 2015 10:20:57 -0500, ĄJones wrote:
>>>
>>>>On Fri, 26 Jun 2015 08:07:32 -0400, in talk.politics.guns
>>>>slate_leeper wrote:
>>>>
>>>>>Now you have flipped your argument. "Other violent uses of guns"
>>>>>indeed. How about "other violent methods and tools that result in
>>>>>death." That is what you try to wash over when you talk about "gun
>>>>>murders" or "gun violence."
>>>>
>>>>May I remind you that this group is "talk.politics.guns"; why does it
>>>>seem to surprise you that people would discuss the politics of guns
>>>>here? If you want to discuss the violent uses of knives, why not try
>>>>rec.knives?
>>>>
>>>>Jones
>>>
>>>
>>> I understand. Death by any means other than firearm is not important,
>>> and does not count. We have heard this many times from those who wish
>>> to outlaw firearms.
>>
>> Of course, because they don't care about the violence, injury or
>> death. That's simply their excuse. Their real concern is the
>> instrumentality, particularly those that will never be used illegally
>> to result in violence, injury or death against another person.
>
> Or against themselves....per Dudu. I kinda alsways thought that liberals
> supported the right to take one's own life.
While sad, and probably nothing I would ever understand, in principle I
could see how it could considered to be the ultimate expression of one's
rights.
--- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
* Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)
|
