XPost: alt.fan.rush-limbaugh, aus.politics, talk.politics.guns   
   From: me4guns@verizon.removeme.this2.nospam.net   
      
   "Klaus  Schadenfreude"  wrote in   
   message news:4r3r3ilpmhleqgkos6b8efmlngp3pfhvcc@Schadenfreude.com...   
   > On Mon, 17 Apr 2023 12:29:02 -0500, "Scout"   
   >  wrote:   
   >   
   >>   
   >>   
   >>"Rod Speed"  wrote in message   
   >>news:op.13jyxqxfbyq249@pvr2.lan...   
   >>> On Mon, 17 Apr 2023 23:34:30 +1000, Scout   
   >>>  wrote:   
   >>>   
   >   
   >>>>> There was never any gun ban   
   >>>   
   >>>> Excellent, so those people didn't actually have to sell their guns or   
   >>>> have them be in violation of the law?   
   >>>   
   >>> Nope   
   >>   
   >>Then why are people being arrested for guns that weren't turned in?   
   >>   
   >>>   
   >>>> Sounds like a gun ban to me.   
   >>>   
   >>> Then you need a new hearing aid.   
   >>   
   >>Nope, the truth does just fine.   
   >>   
   >>Because there was nothing OPTIONAL about the buyback, rather it was   
   >>MANDATORY. You do know what that word means right?   
   >>   
   >>Further those guns not turned in were banned. In that today it is a felony   
   >>to even be in possession of one.   
   >>   
   >>Walks like  a gun ban.. Talks like a gun ban. Smells like a gun ban..   
   >>because it was a gun ban.   
   >>   
   >>   
   >   
   > Wow. Just wow.   
   >   
   > Maybe "ban" means something different in Australia, like "boot" means   
   > "trunk" or "bonnet" means "hood."   
      
   Perhaps, could just be that gun control advocate stupidity is universal.   
      
   --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05   
    * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)