Forums before death by AOL, social media and spammers... "We can't have nice things"
|    rec.music.dylan    |    Dylan's great, if you can understand him    |    103,360 messages    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
|    Message 102,996 of 103,360    |
|    cheesetray to All    |
|    WHY TO VOTE FOR KH FROM MICHAEL G. (2/2)    |
|    01 Nov 24 00:03:55    |
      [continued from previous message]              crucial hours on January 6th       2021. I believe we need to elect as President a person fully committed       to "protect and defend       the Constitution" under all circumstances.       Michael              PART III THE ECONOMY CLAIM AGAINST BIDEN (and, by implication KH)              Those inclined to vote for former President Trump often say that the       economy for them was              better in the Trump years before the onset of the COVID crisis than       they have been in the post-       COVID years of the Biden administration. By this, they generally refer       to the inflation in the costs              of food, housing and energy. The implication is that the economic       policies of former President       Trump created the better conditions during his administration and that       the policies of the Biden       administration have created and are responsible for the recent       inflation and sense of economic       crisis.       I believe both of these conclusions are mistaken. First, the relative       low inflation from 2017       through 2019, I believe, represented the results of the efforts to       stabilize and grow the economy       by the Obama administration and the Federal Reserve after the Great       Recession. I believe that       little of this relative prosperity (including wage increases for       African-American men alluded to by       commentators such as Bret Stephens) can be attributed to the explicit       policies or initiatives of       the Trump administration (with the possible exception of some modest       stimulus from modest tax       decreases for middle-class families in the 2017 tax legislation).              On the other hand - and I think this has to be said very loudly and       clearly - the inflation in the       post COVID period Is mainly the result first of the severe supply       chain disruptions due to the       shutdowns, quarantines and restrictions on productivity resulting from       the need to contain the       COVID virus. More recently, inflation has been exacerbated by severe       interruptions in shipping       by the war in Ukraine and the wars in the Middle East, and threats to       the safety of maritime       traffic. While the combined stimulus packages of the CARES Act (passed       towards the end of the       Trump administration) and the American Recovery Plan (passed early in       the Biden       administration) may said to have also been factors, these Acts I       believe largely saved America       from a depression or terrible recession in the wake of COVID. I       believe it is also undisputable       that the rate of inflation has significantly fallen in the last year,       largely due to the careful policies       of the Federal Reserve augmented by the policies of the Biden       administration.       Thus, I believe that voting for former President Trump on the premise       that he can better run the       economy or restore the price levels in the first couple of years of       his administration is based on       faulty assumptions and is gravely mistaken. The proposals for an       across-the-board tariff on       foreign imports of good and technology proposed by the former       President is intrinsically       inflationary and likely to reverse the steady if still incomplete       progress in checking inflation while       working to increase wage levels.       One of my disappointments in the debate during this election season is       that there has not been       a more comprehensible discussion about the reasons for the economic       pain experienced by       many Americans despite the state of our economy being what Heather Cox       Richardson calls       "the envy of the world." I believe that the long-term       infrastructure, research and development,       and capital commitment legislation passed during the Biden       administration is a major       accomplishment that a Harris administration will sustain and build on,       but that a second Trump       administration is more likely to undermine and undo by misguided       approaches such as the       Trump campaign's tariff proposals. Thus, I think that voters for whom       the state of the economy is       a major concern should be voting for the Harris-Walz ticket so that       the foundations for a strong       U.S. economy laid by the Biden administration can be built on and       strengthened.       Michael              Part IV THE DO-NOTHING CLAIM AGAINST KH              Former President Trump and Senator Vance have often suggested that       somehow Vice       President Harris could have seen to the enactment of her policy       proposals and initiatives during       the three years she has been Vice President.       I think this suggestion is unfair - and very ironic as well - for the       following reasons:       First, very obviously, the Vice President is not the President and       therefore has not had unilateral       control of the Biden administration’s agenda.       But more importantly, President Biden and Vice President Harris have       tried to advance some of       the Vice-President's proposals and others that flow from a belief in       the power of government to       maintain fairness and opportunity in our economic and social systems.       A striking example to me       is the expanded childcare credit, which was passed temporarily under       the American Recovery       Plan in 2021 but had to be pared back in the 2022 budget negotiations       due to opposition mainly       from Republican lawmakers and, yes, a few Democratic or independent       lawmakers, especially       in the U.S. Senate. Other plans to provide initiatives designed to       support workers in the service       economy had to be scrapped because of opposition largely if not       exclusively from Republican       lawmakers.       To ensure that more of the proposals and initiatives proposed by Vice       President Harris can be       fairly considered, refined, and implemented requires not only on       electing Vice President Harris       to be the next President of the United States but also on electing a       majority of Senators and       Representatives who understand the potential of government to support       economic security and       encourage fair competition and a level playing field for       entrepreneurship and investment, be       they Democrats, Independents or Republicans who are willing to work       with the Vice-President in       pursuit of her goals for our country and its people.              Michael              --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05        * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
(c) 1994, bbs@darkrealms.ca