c74b4732
From: lebow@highaltitudes.net
On Fri, 11 Feb 2011 13:49:50 -0800 (PST), Hieronymous Corey
wrote:
>On Feb 11, 12:31 pm, Will Dockery wrote:
>> Hieronymous Corey wrote:
>>
>>
>>
>> > if any casual readers end up here looking for Doo-Nanny, then
>> > they're very lost.
>>
>> Not at all, since the link(s) below will take them right where they
>> need to be:
>
>The point is there is no evidence that there are, were, or ever will
>be any of 'them' to take anywhere, and if on the off chance one or two
>casual readers did make it here, reposting a link is essentially
>inconsequential in terms of its effect on disseminating Doo-Nanny
>information to those desiring the information. Of course it makes you
>feel better to think that you're performing a small public service and
>that your effort isn't completely wasted, but that's only because you
>don't realize in terms of real numbers just how close to absolutely
>pointless your effort actually is.
This is not my argument - sorry to intrude.
I scan this group from time to time to see if there is any pertimnent
info to me re artists, recordings or gigs
I look for blues ,celtic and...
So my reason for this post is that every day there have been several
posts about this doo nanny for quite a while now
There have been so many posts after the initial info that it does not
interest me anymore - IMHO
I have no problems w WIll posting but to me it was overkill and I
stopped reading the posts
I do not mean to be negative in any way
IMHO
Fred
I have nobody kill filed here but on rec.outdoors.fishing.fly
There is such a FOOL and a couple of jerks that I had to use the kill
file
Fortnately
not so here
Fred
--- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
* Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)
|
