XPost: alt.music.michael-jackson, soc.culture.usa, alt.true-crime   
   XPost: us.talk.headline-news   
   From: buzzard@buzzardnest.us   
      
   "urchin"  wrote in message   
   news:dbcopper-0706051027130001@ppp-02.modems.network.colby.edu...   
   > In article <1118108942.737306.213860@g44g2000cwa.googlegroups.com>,   
   > al2048@aol.com wrote:   
   >   
   >> Uncle Buck wrote:   
   >> >   
   >> > Frankly, even if by some miracle he actually is innocent, it's   
   >> > his own   
   >> > damned fault.  You don't keep sleeping with hoards of little boys   
   >> > once   
   >> > you've been accused of molesting one of them.   
   >>   
   >>   
   >> By your logic, a man who has been falsely accused of raping a woman   
   >> should never date a woman again.   
   >>   
   >> Regards,   
   >>   
   >> Alex K.   
      
   ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^   
   That statement is totally fucked up and without logic.. it has to be   
   the   
   worst anology I ever read on usenet.   
      
   >   
   >   
   > Not necessarily, but he sure as hell should be a little more   
   > cautious in the future about who he dates and what constitutes   
   > permissable contact, to be seen in public places, keep a log of   
   > alibi's as protection from ever being falsely accused again.   
   > Because, guilty or not, he's going to be looked at again   
   > when some other woman gets raped.   
      
      
   ok.. my bad.. I made a mistake.. THIS statement was the worst anology   
   I ever read on usenet.   
      
   Lets take a look at the above statement people:   
      
   "he sure as hell should be a little more   
   cautious in the future about who he dates and what constitutes   
   permissable contact"   
      
   So, instead of saying he shouldn't be TOUCHING children in anyway   
   shape or form.. you suggest he be... "a little more cautious"?   
   Thats fucked up.. thats like saying.. if he is going to touch   
   children.. make   
   sure you get rid of the body and all evidence afterwards.   
      
   next.. we have this:   
      
   "keep a log of alibi's as protection from ever being falsely accused   
   again."   
      
   The first thing wrong that I will point out is that fact that he is   
   NOT FALSELY   
   ACCUSED!  He fucking DID TOUCH A CHILD PENIS.  No questions about it.   
   The second thing wrong with the statement.. is the fact that because   
   he did touch   
   a childs penis.. preformed oral sex on him and many others.. paid   
   people 'hush money'...   
   jacked off the small child.. put the childs hands on his penis.. he   
   should actually   
   start to keep a book of alibi's for protection.. or is it just a book   
   of lies that will   
   have people stating he was here or there.. and probably will get paid   
   for saying   
   said statement..   
      
   In a bottle.. you are a PEDO SUPPORTER!   
      
   I collect websites.. you have one of those?  I would like to look at   
   it.   
      
   --   
   Dope Plant   
   Member of the Jedi with a broken light saber.   
      
   --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05   
    * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)