XPost: rec.arts.tv   
   From: suzeeq@imbris.com   
      
   On 9/18/2024 9:34 AM, BTR1701 wrote:   
   > On Sep 18, 2024 at 9:17:14 AM PDT, "suzeeq" wrote:   
   >   
   >> On 9/18/2024 9:11 AM, BTR1701 wrote:   
   >>> On Sep 18, 2024 at 8:41:07 AM PDT, "shawn"    
   >>> wrote:   
   >>>   
   >>>> On Wed, 18 Sep 2024 13:55:15 -0000 (UTC), BTR1701    
   >>>> wrote:   
   >>>>   
   >>>>> On Sep 17, 2024 at 11:07:36 PM PDT, "super70s"    
   >>>>> wrote:   
   >>>>>   
   >>>>>> On 2024-09-18 04:46:16 +0000, BTR1701 said:   
   >>>>>>   
   >>>>>>> In article ,   
   >>>>>>> Your Name wrote:   
   >>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>> On 9/14/24 1:38 PM, BTR1701 wrote:   
   >>>>>>>>> In article ,   
   >>>>>>>>> Ubiquitous wrote:   
   >>>>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>>>> Megyn Kelly blasted Taylor Swift after the pop star came out   
   and endorsed   
   >>>>>>>>>> Vice President Kamala Harris for president following the ABC   
   Presidential   
   >>>>>>>>>> Debate.   
   >>>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>>> Before anyone lets Swift influence their vote, they ought to   
   stop and   
   >>>>>>>>> consider that 90% of her songs are about how she always chooses   
   the   
   >>>>>>>>> wrong person.   
   >>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>> But those songs are about her appalling taste in boyfriends   
   (except the   
   >>>>>>>> pot-shot at Katy Perry) and I doubt she wants Harris as her   
   "boyfriend"   
   >>>>>>>> ... although, it would be a much better choice than any of her   
   previous   
   >>>>>>>> or curerent braindead morons.   
   >>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>> Taylor Swift is a billionaire.   
   >>>>>>   
   >>>>>> So is Trump. At least that's what he claims. Who knows what he may   
   owe   
   >>>>>> Russian oligarchs that doesn't show up on his financial statements.   
   >>>>>>   
   >>>>>>> She's not at the grocery store having to   
   >>>>>>> decide whether to feed her family or pay her mortgage.   
   >>>>>>   
   >>>>>> Neither is Trump.   
   >>>>>>   
   >>>>>>> She's not at the gas pump deciding if she can fill her tank up or   
   just   
   >>>>>>> settle for half because gas prices are so high.   
   >>>>>>   
   >>>>>> Neither is Trump.   
   >>>>>   
   >>>>> Trump isn't the one saying the economy is super-duper thanks to   
   Democrats.   
   >>>>>   
   >>>>>>> While she's flying her private jets around the world, you're   
   struggling   
   >>>>>>> to gas up your car just so you can get to work.   
   >>>>>>   
   >>>>>> Really? Gas is around $2.70/gal. around here.   
   >>>>>   
   >>>>> $5.12 in deep blue California, down from a high of over $7.00/gallon   
   in the   
   >>>>> last year, in a state run by Democrats from top to bottom.   
   >>>>   
   >>>> That's going to remain the same even if Trump wins the Presidency as   
   >>>> you well know. Since the reason for your high gas prices is due to   
   >>>> California politics. Price in gas has been coming down. I just noticed   
   >>>> even the premium has dropped below $3/gallon here in the Atlanta area.   
   >>>>   
   >>>>>>> (That's when you're not worrying how long it'll be before the   
   >>>>>>> 'progressives'   
   >>>>>>> in your state legislature sacrifice your car altogether to   
   appease their   
   >>>>>>> Climate Cult.)   
   >>>>>>   
   >>>>>> Pure scare tactics, we know how desperate the right is these days.   
   >>>>>   
   >>>>> Might want to look into Gavvy Newsom's ban on gas-powered vehicles by   
   2030,   
   >>>>> genius. And as the California car market goes, traditionally so goes   
   the   
   >>>>> rest   
   >>>>> of the nation.   
   >>>>   
   >>>> It won't happen as too many states in the USA will never go for that.   
   >>>   
   >>> They will if the federal government follows California's lead. Kammie is   
   a   
   >>> graduate of the same San Francisco school of politics that produced Jerry   
   >>> Brown, Gavin Newsom, Chesa Boudin, and Nancy Pelosi. What makes you think   
   >>> she   
   >>> won't take their baton and run with it?   
   >>>   
   >>>> Especially given how electric vehicles behave when it turns really   
   >>>> cold. Not something you want when even your nearest neighbor may be   
   >>>> miles away.   
   >>>   
   >>> Not a concern for Gavvy. We have plenty of places that get snow and   
   freezing   
   >>> temps in California but the Climate Cult doesn't care. The ultimate goal   
   is   
   >>> to   
   >>> end private car ownership altogether, of course.   
   >>>   
   >> Not like in the northern tier of states, where temps are often below   
   >> zero, and sometimes down to -40 with the wind chill.   
   >   
   > At an average of 411.5 inches per year, Donner Pass, California, is one of   
   the   
   > snowiest places in the contiguous United States. Four times since 1880 total   
   > snowfall at Donner Summit has exceeded 775 inches and topped 800 inches in   
   > both 1938 and 1952. Winds in the pass can also become extreme and wind gusts   
   > in excess of 100 miles per hour are common during winter storms. Winter   
   > temperatures in the area often drop below 0 °F for weeks at a time each   
   year;   
   > the all-time record low for California of −45 °F (real temperature without   
   > wind chill) was recorded in the Sierra Nevada in the area around the Donner   
   > Pass in January 1937.   
   >   
   I know, I used to live on the N shore of Tahoe in the late 1970s.   
   However, it seldom gets that cold there anymore. When the temps gets   
   below 0 it's only for a week. You're quoting conditions tat haven't been   
   see for 70 to 85 years ago. Things have changed.   
      
   --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05   
    * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)   
|