XPost: rec.arts.tv   
   From: nobody@nowhere.com   
      
   On 9/18/2024 1:44 PM, suzeeq wrote:   
   >   
   > On 9/18/2024 9:34 AM, BTR1701 wrote:   
   >> On Sep 18, 2024 at 9:17:14 AM PDT, "suzeeq" wrote:   
   >>   
   >>> On 9/18/2024 9:11 AM, BTR1701 wrote:   
   >>>> On Sep 18, 2024 at 8:41:07 AM PDT, "shawn"   
   >>>>    
   >>>> wrote:   
   >>>>> On Wed, 18 Sep 2024 13:55:15 -0000 (UTC), BTR1701    
   >>>>> wrote:   
   >>>>>   
   >>>>>> On Sep 17, 2024 at 11:07:36 PM PDT, "super70s"   
   >>>>>>    
   >>>>>> wrote:   
   >>>>>>   
   >>>>>>> On 2024-09-18 04:46:16 +0000, BTR1701 said:   
   >>>>>>>> In article ,   
   >>>>>>>> Your Name wrote:   
   >>>>>>>>> On 9/14/24 1:38 PM, BTR1701 wrote:   
   >>>>>>>>>> In article ,   
   >>>>>>>>>> Ubiquitous wrote:   
   >>>>>>>>>>> Megyn Kelly blasted Taylor Swift after the pop star came   
   >>>>>>>>>>> out and endorsed   
   >>>>>>>>>>> Vice President Kamala Harris for president following the   
   >>>>>>>>>>> ABC Presidential   
   >>>>>>>>>>> Debate.   
   >>>>>>>>>> Before anyone lets Swift influence their vote, they ought   
   >>>>>>>>>> to stop and   
   >>>>>>>>>> consider that 90% of her songs are about how she always   
   >>>>>>>>>> chooses the   
   >>>>>>>>>> wrong person.   
   >>>>>>>>> But those songs are about her appalling taste in   
   >>>>>>>>> boyfriends (except the   
   >>>>>>>>> pot-shot at Katy Perry) and I doubt she wants Harris as   
   >>>>>>>>> her "boyfriend"   
   >>>>>>>>> ... although, it would be a much better choice than any of   
   >>>>>>>>> her previous   
   >>>>>>>>> or curerent braindead morons.   
   >>>>>>>> Taylor Swift is a billionaire.   
   >>>>>>> So is Trump. At least that's what he claims. Who knows what   
   >>>>>>> he may owe   
   >>>>>>> Russian oligarchs that doesn't show up on his financial   
   >>>>>>> statements.   
   >>>>>>>> She's not at the grocery store having to   
   >>>>>>>> decide whether to feed her family or pay her mortgage.   
   >>>>>>> Neither is Trump.   
   >>>>>>>> She's not at the gas pump deciding if she can fill her tank   
   >>>>>>>> up or just   
   >>>>>>>> settle for half because gas prices are so high.   
   >>>>>>> Neither is Trump.   
   >>>>>>   
   >>>>>> Trump isn't the one saying the economy is super-duper thanks to   
   >>>>>> Democrats.   
   >>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>> While she's flying her private jets around the world,   
   >>>>>>>> you're struggling   
   >>>>>>>> to gas up your car just so you can get to work.   
   >>>>>>> Really? Gas is around $2.70/gal. around here.   
   >>>>>>   
   >>>>>> $5.12 in deep blue California, down from a high of over   
   >>>>>> $7.00/gallon in the   
   >>>>>> last year, in a state run by Democrats from top to bottom.   
   >>>>>   
   >>>>> That's going to remain the same even if Trump wins the Presidency as   
   >>>>> you well know. Since the reason for your high gas prices is due to   
   >>>>> California politics. Price in gas has been coming down. I just   
   >>>>> noticed   
   >>>>> even the premium has dropped below $3/gallon here in the Atlanta   
   >>>>> area.   
   >>>>>   
   >>>>>>>> (That's when you're not worrying how long it'll be before the   
   >>>>>>>> 'progressives'   
   >>>>>>>> in your state legislature sacrifice your car altogether to   
   >>>>>>>> appease their   
   >>>>>>>> Climate Cult.)   
   >>>>>>> Pure scare tactics, we know how desperate the right is these   
   >>>>>>> days.   
   >>>>>>   
   >>>>>> Might want to look into Gavvy Newsom's ban on gas-powered   
   >>>>>> vehicles by 2030,   
   >>>>>> genius. And as the California car market goes, traditionally so   
   >>>>>> goes the   
   >>>>>> rest   
   >>>>>> of the nation.   
   >>>>>   
   >>>>> It won't happen as too many states in the USA will never go for   
   >>>>> that.   
   >>>> They will if the federal government follows California's lead.   
   >>>> Kammie is a   
   >>>> graduate of the same San Francisco school of politics that   
   >>>> produced Jerry   
   >>>> Brown, Gavin Newsom, Chesa Boudin, and Nancy Pelosi. What makes   
   >>>> you think   
   >>>> she   
   >>>> won't take their baton and run with it?   
   >>>>> Especially given how electric vehicles behave when it turns really   
   >>>>> cold. Not something you want when even your nearest neighbor may be   
   >>>>> miles away.   
   >>>> Not a concern for Gavvy. We have plenty of places that get snow   
   >>>> and freezing   
   >>>> temps in California but the Climate Cult doesn't care. The   
   >>>> ultimate goal is   
   >>>> to   
   >>>> end private car ownership altogether, of course.   
   >>> Not like in the northern tier of states, where temps are often below   
   >>> zero, and sometimes down to -40 with the wind chill.   
   >>   
   >> At an average of 411.5 inches per year, Donner Pass, California, is   
   >> one of the   
   >> snowiest places in the contiguous United States. Four times since 1880   
   >> total   
   >> snowfall at Donner Summit has exceeded 775 inches and topped 800   
   >> inches in   
   >> both 1938 and 1952. Winds in the pass can also become extreme and wind   
   >> gusts   
   >> in excess of 100 miles per hour are common during winter storms. Winter   
   >> temperatures in the area often drop below 0 °F for weeks at a time   
   >> each year;   
   >> the all-time record low for California of −45 °F (real temperature   
   >> without   
   >> wind chill) was recorded in the Sierra Nevada in the area around the   
   >> Donner   
   >> Pass in January 1937.   
   >>   
   > I know, I used to live on the N shore of Tahoe in the late 1970s.   
   > However, it seldom gets that cold there anymore. When the temps gets   
   > below 0 it's only for a week. You're quoting conditions tat haven't been   
   > see for 70 to 85 years ago. Things have changed.   
      
   That's climate-alarmist talk. Your thermometer must be Leftist...   
      
   --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05   
    * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)   
|