XPost: rec.arts.tv
From: atropos@mac.com
In article ,
moviePig wrote:
> On 9/22/2024 6:57 PM, BTR1701 wrote:
> > In article ,
> > moviePig wrote:
> >
> >> On 9/22/2024 5:44 PM, BTR1701 wrote:
> >>> In article , moviePig
> >>> wrote:
> >>>
> >>>> On 9/18/2024 1:44 PM, suzeeq wrote:
> >>>>>
> >>>>> On 9/18/2024 9:34 AM, BTR1701 wrote:
> >>>>>> On Sep 18, 2024 at 9:17:14 AM PDT, "suzeeq" wrote:
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>>> On 9/18/2024 9:11 AM, BTR1701 wrote:
> >>>>>>>> On Sep 18, 2024 at 8:41:07 AM PDT, "shawn"
> >>>>>>>> wrote:
> >>>
> >>>>>>>>> Especially given how electric vehicles behave when it turns really
> >>>>>>>>> cold. Not something you want when even your nearest neighbor may be
> >>>>>>>>> miles away.
> >>>
> >>>>>>>> Not a concern for Gavvy. We have plenty of places that get snow
> >>>>>>>> and freezing temps in California but the Climate Cult doesn't care.
> >>>
> >>>>>>> Not like in the northern tier of states, where temps are often below
> >>>>>>> zero, and sometimes down to -40 with the wind chill.
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> At an average of 411.5 inches per year, Donner Pass, California, is
> >>>>>> one of the snowiest places in the contiguous United States. Four
> >>>>>> times since 1880 total snowfall at Donner Summit has exceeded 775
> >>>>>> inches and topped 800 inches in both 1938 and 1952. Winds in the
> >>>>>> pass can also become extreme and wind gusts in excess of 100 miles
> >>>>>> per hour are common during winter storms. Winter temperatures in the
> >>>>>> area often drop below 0°F for weeks at a time each year;
> >>>>>> the all-time record low for California of -45°F (real temperature
> >>>>>> without wind chill) was recorded in the Sierra Nevada in the area
> >>>>>> around the Donner Pass in January 1937.
> >>>>>>
> >>>>> I know, I used to live on the N shore of Tahoe in the late 1970s.
> >>>>> However, it seldom gets that cold there anymore. When the temps gets
> >>>>> below 0 it's only for a week. You're quoting conditions tat haven't
been
> >>>>> see for 70 to 85 years ago. Things have changed.
> >>>>
> >>>> That's climate-alarmist talk. Your thermometer must be Leftist...
> >>>
> >>> Looks like it's time for Part 2 in my "How the Media and Democrats Lie
> >>> to You" series. Earlier I detailed how they lie to you about crime. This
> >>> time we'll learn how they lie to you about 'climate change'.
> >>>
> >>> The L.A. Times recently published the latest in what seems to be a
> >>> never-ending series designed to scare you into converting to the Climate
> >>> Cult.
> >>>
> >>> https://www.latimes.com/environment/story/2024-09-09/hotter-drier-differe
> >>> nt-how-climate-change-will-alter-l-a
> >>>
> >>> Basically, it's all about how 'climate change' will alter your life in
> >>> L.A:
> >>>
> >>> "Will it be a fiery landscape where sizzling sidewalks cause
> >>> second-degree burns, wildfire smoke blots out the sun, and water flows
> >>> only sometimes, and mostly not at all? Or will California's penchant for
> >>> innovation be our salvation?"
> >>>
> >>> ("Salvation"... notice the religious tones and connotations associated
> >>> with stories like this.)
> >>>
> >>> "The youth of our planet will have to live in the environment we've
> >>> created for them but there's still time to seize control of our
> >>> collective destiny."
> >>>
> >>> ("Collective"... notice the socialist/communist verbiage associated with
> >>> stories like this.)
> >>>
> >>> The article and all others like it are peppered with dire claims about
> >>> heat records being blown away:
> >>>
> >>> "Southern California wildfires spread with record heat."
> >>>
> >>> "Brutal heatwave breaks records across Southern California."
> >>>
> >>> The constant drumbeat about shattered temperature records is interesting
> >>> because they almost always just make the assertion that this is record
> >>> heat but never actually back it up with facts.
> >>>
> >>> So I went to LA Almanac.com and looked up the day-by-day record high
> >>> temperatures in the month of September for Los Angeles.
> >>>
> >>> Month/Day Record High Record Low
> >>> Sep 1 110 (1955) 49 (1901)
> >>> Sep 2 108 (1955) 51 (1881)
> >>> Sep 3 103 (1988) 51 (1892)
> >>> Sep 4 110 (1988) 52 (1892)
> >>> Sep 5 105 (1984) 50 (1898)
> >>> Sep 6 111 (2020) 48 (1898)
> >>> Sep 7 103 (1949) 50 (1884)
> >>> Sep 8 103 (1984) 47 (1901)
> >>> Sep 9 102 (1956) 48 (1884)
> >>> Sep 10 103 (1983) 52 (1893)
> >>> Sep 11 101 (1983) 48 (1901)
> >>> Sep 12 102 (1971) 48 (1884)
> >>> Sep 13 106 (1971) 48 (1884)
> >>> Sep 14 100 (2012) 48 (1898)
> >>> Sep 15 103 (2012) 49 (1895)
> >>> Sep 16 103 (2014) 48 (1884)
> >>> Sep 17 108 (1913) 46 (1884)
> >>> Sep 18 103 (1939) 48 (1884)
> >>> Sep 19 104 (1939) 49 (1907)
> >>> Sep 20 107 (1939) 49 (1900)
> >>> Sep 21 108 (1885) 47 (1880)
> >>> Sep 22 104 (1883) 48 (1895)
> >>> Sep 23 104 (1978) 44 (1880)
> >>> Sep 24 106 (1978) 45 (1880)
> >>> Sep 25 107 (1978) 48 (1879)
> >>> Sep 26 109 (1963) 48 (1893)
> >>> Sep 27 113 (2010) 46 (1901)
> >>> Sep 28 106 (1963) 49 (1901)
> >>> Sep 29 102 (1999) 44 (1880)
> >>> Sep 30 105 (1906) 48 (1886)
> >>>
> >>> What can we conclude from this data?
> >>>
> >>> Well, first and foremost, that the propagandists at the L.A. Times are
> >>> full of shit. They're literally lying to promote an agenda.
> >>>
> >>> September is a hot month in L.A. and has been going back to the 1800s,
> >>> long before SUVs, carbon footprints, 'climate change'. And notably,
> >>> while there are some record highs set post-2000, not one of them is in
> >>> 2024, which makes the Times' claim that our current heat wave is 'record
> >>> heat' or is 'breaking records' a complete falsehood.
> >>>
> >>> And these are the people who are supposedly 'fact-checking' everything
> >>> from your social media posts to your presidential candidates.
> >>>
> >>> Who's fact-checking the fact-checkers?
> >>
> >> The record lows occurred near or prior to the turn of last century,
> >> while the record highs are generally later. Sounds like warming to me.
> >
[continued in next message]
--- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
* Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)
|
