[continued from previous message]   
      
   > > What part of 'record-breaking' do you not understand?   
   >   
   > I didn't read the claims, your or theirs.   
      
   Then you're not qualified to comment on this discussion. The only thing   
   you can do is try to change the subject, which is exactly what you did.   
      
   > As for "record-breaking", records are always being broken somewhere   
   > ...making assertions or denials meaningless. Meanwhile, I'd guess they   
   > care more about eyeballs than agendas, but, then, I can't read minds.   
      
   The L.A. Times doesn't care about money (eyeballs). If it did, then it   
   wouldn't be cratering its business with nothing but wokeness. Every day   
   the headlines consist of story after story about racism, transgenderism,   
   climate change, and how we need more illegals and vagrants or we need to   
   spend more tax money on them. Even it's leftist readers are tired of it   
   and it's losing several hundred million dollars a year as subscription   
   numbers collapse. The billionaire that bought the Times gave it to his   
   activist daughter to play with and lets it run at a loss, but even he   
   has his limits. However, rather than, you know, change the paper back to   
   a real news organization, his solution was to just halve the newsroom   
   and fire hundreds of people.   
      
   --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05   
    * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)