XPost: rec.arts.tv
From: nobody@nowhere.com
On 9/22/2024 5:44 PM, BTR1701 wrote:
> In article , moviePig
> wrote:
>
>> On 9/18/2024 1:44 PM, suzeeq wrote:
>>>
>>> On 9/18/2024 9:34 AM, BTR1701 wrote:
>>>> On Sep 18, 2024 at 9:17:14 AM PDT, "suzeeq" wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> On 9/18/2024 9:11 AM, BTR1701 wrote:
>>>>>> On Sep 18, 2024 at 8:41:07 AM PDT, "shawn"
>>>>>> wrote:
>
>>>>>>> Especially given how electric vehicles behave when it turns really
>>>>>>> cold. Not something you want when even your nearest neighbor may be
>>>>>>> miles away.
>
>>>>>> Not a concern for Gavvy. We have plenty of places that get snow
>>>>>> and freezing temps in California but the Climate Cult doesn't care.
>
>>>>> Not like in the northern tier of states, where temps are often below
>>>>> zero, and sometimes down to -40 with the wind chill.
>>>>
>>>> At an average of 411.5 inches per year, Donner Pass, California, is
>>>> one of the snowiest places in the contiguous United States. Four
>>>> times since 1880 total snowfall at Donner Summit has exceeded 775
>>>> inches and topped 800 inches in both 1938 and 1952. Winds in the
>>>> pass can also become extreme and wind gusts in excess of 100 miles
>>>> per hour are common during winter storms. Winter temperatures in the
>>>> area often drop below 0°F for weeks at a time each year;
>>>> the all-time record low for California of -45°F (real temperature
>>>> without wind chill) was recorded in the Sierra Nevada in the area
>>>> around the Donner Pass in January 1937.
>>>>
>>> I know, I used to live on the N shore of Tahoe in the late 1970s.
>>> However, it seldom gets that cold there anymore. When the temps gets
>>> below 0 it's only for a week. You're quoting conditions tat haven't been
>>> see for 70 to 85 years ago. Things have changed.
>>
>> That's climate-alarmist talk. Your thermometer must be Leftist...
>
> Looks like it's time for Part 2 in my "How the Media and Democrats Lie
> to You" series. Earlier I detailed how they lie to you about crime. This
> time we'll learn how they lie to you about 'climate change'.
>
> The L.A. Times recently published the latest in what seems to be a
> never-ending series designed to scare you into converting to the Climate
> Cult.
>
> https://www.latimes.com/environment/story/2024-09-09/hotter-drier-differe
> nt-how-climate-change-will-alter-l-a
>
> Basically, it's all about how 'climate change' will alter your life in
> L.A:
>
> "Will it be a fiery landscape where sizzling sidewalks cause
> second-degree burns, wildfire smoke blots out the sun, and water flows
> only sometimes, and mostly not at all? Or will California's penchant for
> innovation be our salvation?"
>
> ("Salvation"... notice the religious tones and connotations associated
> with stories like this.)
>
> "The youth of our planet will have to live in the environment we've
> created for them but there's still time to seize control of our
> collective destiny."
>
> ("Collective"... notice the socialist/communist verbiage associated with
> stories like this.)
>
> The article and all others like it are peppered with dire claims about
> heat records being blown away:
>
> "Southern California wildfires spread with record heat."
>
> "Brutal heatwave breaks records across Southern California."
>
> The constant drumbeat about shattered temperature records is interesting
> because they almost always just make the assertion that this is record
> heat but never actually back it up with facts.
>
> So I went to LA Almanac.com and looked up the day-by-day record high
> temperatures in the month of September for Los Angeles.
>
> Month/Day Record High Record Low
> Sep 1 110 (1955) 49 (1901)
> Sep 2 108 (1955) 51 (1881)
> Sep 3 103 (1988) 51 (1892)
> Sep 4 110 (1988) 52 (1892)
> Sep 5 105 (1984) 50 (1898)
> Sep 6 111 (2020) 48 (1898)
> Sep 7 103 (1949) 50 (1884)
> Sep 8 103 (1984) 47 (1901)
> Sep 9 102 (1956) 48 (1884)
> Sep 10 103 (1983) 52 (1893)
> Sep 11 101 (1983) 48 (1901)
> Sep 12 102 (1971) 48 (1884)
> Sep 13 106 (1971) 48 (1884)
> Sep 14 100 (2012) 48 (1898)
> Sep 15 103 (2012) 49 (1895)
> Sep 16 103 (2014) 48 (1884)
> Sep 17 108 (1913) 46 (1884)
> Sep 18 103 (1939) 48 (1884)
> Sep 19 104 (1939) 49 (1907)
> Sep 20 107 (1939) 49 (1900)
> Sep 21 108 (1885) 47 (1880)
> Sep 22 104 (1883) 48 (1895)
> Sep 23 104 (1978) 44 (1880)
> Sep 24 106 (1978) 45 (1880)
> Sep 25 107 (1978) 48 (1879)
> Sep 26 109 (1963) 48 (1893)
> Sep 27 113 (2010) 46 (1901)
> Sep 28 106 (1963) 49 (1901)
> Sep 29 102 (1999) 44 (1880)
> Sep 30 105 (1906) 48 (1886)
>
> What can we conclude from this data?
>
> Well, first and foremost, that the propagandists at the L.A. Times are
> full of shit. They're literally lying to promote an agenda.
>
> September is a hot month in L.A. and has been going back to the 1800s,
> long before SUVs, carbon footprints, 'climate change'. And notably,
> while there are some record highs set post-2000, not one of them is in
> 2024, which makes the Times' claim that our current heat wave is 'record
> heat' or is 'breaking records' a complete falsehood.
>
> And these are the people who are supposedly 'fact-checking' everything
> from your social media posts to your presidential candidates.
>
> Who's fact-checking the fact-checkers?
The record lows occurred near or prior to the turn of last century,
while the record highs are generally later. Sounds like warming to me.
--- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
* Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)
|
