[continued from previous message]   
      
   >>>>>> And these are the people who are supposedly 'fact-checking' everything   
   >>>>>> from your social media posts to your presidential candidates.   
   >>>>>>   
   >>>>>> Who's fact-checking the fact-checkers?   
   >>>>>   
   >>>>> The record lows occurred near or prior to the turn of last century,   
   >>>>> while the record highs are generally later. Sounds like warming to me.   
   >>>>   
   >>>> What part of 'record-breaking' do you not understand?   
   >>>   
   >>> I didn't read the claims, your or theirs.   
   >>   
   >> Then you're not qualified to comment on this discussion. The only thing   
   >> you can do is try to change the subject, which is exactly what you did.   
   >   
   > "Not qualified"???   
      
   Yes, if you haven't read either my claims or the newspaper's, by definition   
   you don't what's being discussed here. In other words, not qualified.   
      
   --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05   
    * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)