XPost: rec.arts.tv
From: weberm@polaris.net
atropos@mac.com wrote:
> moviePig wrote:
>> On 9/22/2024 5:44 PM, BTR1701 wrote:
>> > moviePig wrote:
>> >> On 9/18/2024 1:44 PM, suzeeq wrote:
>> >>> On 9/18/2024 9:34 AM, BTR1701 wrote:
>> >>>> "suzeeq" wrote:
>> >>>>> On 9/18/2024 9:11 AM, BTR1701 wrote:
>> >>>>>> "shawn" wrote:
>> >>>>>>> Especially given how electric vehicles behave when it turns really
>> >>>>>>> cold. Not something you want when even your nearest neighbor may
>> >>>>>>> be miles away.
>> >>>>>>
>> >>>>>> Not a concern for Gavvy. We have plenty of places that get snow
>> >>>>>> and freezing temps in California but the Climate Cult doesn't care.
>> >>>>>
>> >>>>> Not like in the northern tier of states, where temps are often below
>> >>>>> zero, and sometimes down to -40 with the wind chill.
>> >>>>
>> >>>> At an average of 411.5 inches per year, Donner Pass, California, is
>> >>>> one of the snowiest places in the contiguous United States. Four
>> >>>> times since 1880 total snowfall at Donner Summit has exceeded 775
>> >>>> inches and topped 800 inches in both 1938 and 1952. Winds in the
>> >>>> pass can also become extreme and wind gusts in excess of 100 miles
>> >>>> per hour are common during winter storms. Winter temperatures in the
>> >>>> area often drop below 0°F for weeks at a time each year;
>> >>>> the all-time record low for California of -45°F (real temperature
>> >>>> without wind chill) was recorded in the Sierra Nevada in the area
>> >>>> around the Donner Pass in January 1937.
>> >>>>
>> >>> I know, I used to live on the N shore of Tahoe in the late 1970s.
>> >>> However, it seldom gets that cold there anymore. When the temps gets
>> >>> below 0 it's only for a week. You're quoting conditions tat haven't
>> >>> been see for 70 to 85 years ago. Things have changed.
>> >>
>> >> That's climate-alarmist talk. Your thermometer must be Leftist...
>> >
>> > Looks like it's time for Part 2 in my "How the Media and Democrats Lie
>> > to You" series. Earlier I detailed how they lie to you about crime. This
>> > time we'll learn how they lie to you about 'climate change'.
>> >
>> > The L.A. Times recently published the latest in what seems to be a
>> > never-ending series designed to scare you into converting to the Climate
>> > Cult.
>> >
>> > https://www.latimes.com/environment/story/2024-09-09/hotter-drier-
differe
>> > nt-how-climate-change-will-alter-l-a
>> >
>> > Basically, it's all about how 'climate change' will alter your life in
>> > L.A:
>> >
>> > "Will it be a fiery landscape where sizzling sidewalks cause
>> > second-degree burns, wildfire smoke blots out the sun, and water flows
>> > only sometimes, and mostly not at all? Or will California's penchant for
>> > innovation be our salvation?"
>> >
>> > ("Salvation"... notice the religious tones and connotations associated
>> > with stories like this.)
>> >
>> > "The youth of our planet will have to live in the environment we've
>> > created for them but there's still time to seize control of our
>> > collective destiny."
>> >
>> > ("Collective"... notice the socialist/communist verbiage associated with
>> > stories like this.)
>> >
>> > The article and all others like it are peppered with dire claims about
>> > heat records being blown away:
>> >
>> > "Southern California wildfires spread with record heat."
>> >
>> > "Brutal heatwave breaks records across Southern California."
>> >
>> > The constant drumbeat about shattered temperature records is interesting
>> > because they almost always just make the assertion that this is record
>> > heat but never actually back it up with facts.
>> >
>> > So I went to LA Almanac.com and looked up the day-by-day record high
>> > temperatures in the month of September for Los Angeles.
>> >
>> > Month/Day Record High Record Low
>> > Sep 1 110 (1955) 49 (1901)
>> > Sep 2 108 (1955) 51 (1881)
>> > Sep 3 103 (1988) 51 (1892)
>> > Sep 4 110 (1988) 52 (1892)
>> > Sep 5 105 (1984) 50 (1898)
>> > Sep 6 111 (2020) 48 (1898)
>> > Sep 7 103 (1949) 50 (1884)
>> > Sep 8 103 (1984) 47 (1901)
>> > Sep 9 102 (1956) 48 (1884)
>> > Sep 10 103 (1983) 52 (1893)
>> > Sep 11 101 (1983) 48 (1901)
>> > Sep 12 102 (1971) 48 (1884)
>> > Sep 13 106 (1971) 48 (1884)
>> > Sep 14 100 (2012) 48 (1898)
>> > Sep 15 103 (2012) 49 (1895)
>> > Sep 16 103 (2014) 48 (1884)
>> > Sep 17 108 (1913) 46 (1884)
>> > Sep 18 103 (1939) 48 (1884)
>> > Sep 19 104 (1939) 49 (1907)
>> > Sep 20 107 (1939) 49 (1900)
>> > Sep 21 108 (1885) 47 (1880)
>> > Sep 22 104 (1883) 48 (1895)
>> > Sep 23 104 (1978) 44 (1880)
>> > Sep 24 106 (1978) 45 (1880)
>> > Sep 25 107 (1978) 48 (1879)
>> > Sep 26 109 (1963) 48 (1893)
>> > Sep 27 113 (2010) 46 (1901)
>> > Sep 28 106 (1963) 49 (1901)
>> > Sep 29 102 (1999) 44 (1880)
>> > Sep 30 105 (1906) 48 (1886)
>> >
>> > What can we conclude from this data?
>> >
>> > Well, first and foremost, that the propagandists at the L.A. Times are
>> > full of shit. They're literally lying to promote an agenda.
>> >
>> > September is a hot month in L.A. and has been going back to the 1800s,
>> > long before SUVs, carbon footprints, 'climate change'. And notably,
>> > while there are some record highs set post-2000, not one of them is in
>> > 2024, which makes the Times' claim that our current heat wave is 'record
>> > heat' or is 'breaking records' a complete falsehood.
>> >
>> > And these are the people who are supposedly 'fact-checking' everything
>> > from your social media posts to your presidential candidates.
>> >
>> > Who's fact-checking the fact-checkers?
>>
>> The record lows occurred near or prior to the turn of last century,
>> while the record highs are generally later. Sounds like warming to me.
>
>What part of 'record-breaking' do you not understand?
That would be "the part where moviepig was unable to offre a rebuttal".
--
Let's go Brandon!
--- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
* Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)
|
