XPost: rec.arts.tv
From: nobody@nowhere.com
On 9/24/2024 12:58 AM, BTR1701 wrote:
> moviePig wrote:
>> On 9/23/2024 1:29 PM, BTR1701 wrote:
>>> In article , moviePig
>>> wrote:
>>>
>>>> On 9/22/2024 6:57 PM, BTR1701 wrote:
>>>>> In article , moviePig
>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>> On 9/22/2024 5:44 PM, BTR1701 wrote:
>>>>>>> In article , moviePig
>>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> On 9/18/2024 1:44 PM, suzeeq wrote:
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> On 9/18/2024 9:34 AM, BTR1701 wrote:
>>>>>>>>>> On Sep 18, 2024 at 9:17:14 AM PDT, "suzeeq"
>>>>>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> On 9/18/2024 9:11 AM, BTR1701 wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>> On Sep 18, 2024 at 8:41:07 AM PDT, "shawn"
>>>>>>>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> Especially given how electric vehicles behave
>>>>>>>>>>>>> when it turns really cold. Not something you
>>>>>>>>>>>>> want when even your nearest neighbor may be
>>>>>>>>>>>>> miles away.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> Not a concern for Gavvy. We have plenty of
>>>>>>>>>>>> places that get snow and freezing temps in
>>>>>>>>>>>> California but the Climate Cult doesn't care.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> Not like in the northern tier of states, where
>>>>>>>>>>> temps are often below zero, and sometimes down to
>>>>>>>>>>> -40 with the wind chill.
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> At an average of 411.5 inches per year, Donner
>>>>>>>>>> Pass, California, is one of the snowiest places in
>>>>>>>>>> the contiguous United States. Four times since 1880
>>>>>>>>>> total snowfall at Donner Summit has exceeded 775
>>>>>>>>>> inches and topped 800 inches in both 1938 and 1952.
>>>>>>>>>> Winds in the pass can also become extreme and wind
>>>>>>>>>> gusts in excess of 100 miles per hour are common
>>>>>>>>>> during winter storms. Winter temperatures in the
>>>>>>>>>> area often drop below 0°F for weeks at a time each
>>>>>>>>>> year; the all-time record low for California of
>>>>>>>>>> -45°F (real temperature without wind chill) was
>>>>>>>>>> recorded in the Sierra Nevada in the area around
>>>>>>>>>> the Donner Pass in January 1937.
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> I know, I used to live on the N shore of Tahoe in the
>>>>>>>>> late 1970s. However, it seldom gets that cold there
>>>>>>>>> anymore. When the temps gets below 0 it's only for a
>>>>>>>>> week. You're quoting conditions tat haven't been see
>>>>>>>>> for 70 to 85 years ago. Things have changed.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> That's climate-alarmist talk. Your thermometer must be
>>>>>>>> Leftist...
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Looks like it's time for Part 2 in my "How the Media and
>>>>>>> Democrats Lie to You" series. Earlier I detailed how they
>>>>>>> lie to you about crime. This time we'll learn how they
>>>>>>> lie to you about 'climate change'.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> The L.A. Times recently published the latest in what
>>>>>>> seems to be a never-ending series designed to scare you
>>>>>>> into converting to the Climate Cult.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> https://www.latimes.com/environment/story/2024-09-09/hot
er-drier-differe
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
nt-how-climate-change-will-alter-l-a
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Basically, it's all about how 'climate change' will alter
>>>>>>> your life in L.A:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> "Will it be a fiery landscape where sizzling sidewalks
>>>>>>> cause second-degree burns, wildfire smoke blots out the
>>>>>>> sun, and water flows only sometimes, and mostly not at
>>>>>>> all? Or will California's penchant for innovation be our
>>>>>>> salvation?"
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> ("Salvation"... notice the religious tones and
>>>>>>> connotations associated with stories like this.)
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> "The youth of our planet will have to live in the
>>>>>>> environment we've created for them but there's still time
>>>>>>> to seize control of our collective destiny."
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> ("Collective"... notice the socialist/communist verbiage
>>>>>>> associated with stories like this.)
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> The article and all others like it are peppered with dire
>>>>>>> claims about heat records being blown away:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> "Southern California wildfires spread with record heat."
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> "Brutal heatwave breaks records across Southern
>>>>>>> California."
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> The constant drumbeat about shattered temperature records
>>>>>>> is interesting because they almost always just make the
>>>>>>> assertion that this is record heat but never actually
>>>>>>> back it up with facts.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> So I went to LA Almanac.com and looked up the day-by-day
>>>>>>> record high temperatures in the month of September for
>>>>>>> Los Angeles.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Month/Day Record High Record Low Sep 1 110
>>>>>>> (1955) 49 (1901) Sep 2 108 (1955) 51
>>>>>>> (1881) Sep 3 103 (1988) 51 (1892) Sep 4
>>>>>>> 110 (1988) 52 (1892) Sep 5 105 (1984) 50
>>>>>>> (1898) Sep 6 111 (2020) 48 (1898) Sep 7
>>>>>>> 103 (1949) 50 (1884) Sep 8 103 (1984) 47
>>>>>>> (1901) Sep 9 102 (1956) 48 (1884) Sep 10
>>>>>>> 103 (1983) 52 (1893) Sep 11 101 (1983) 48
>>>>>>> (1901) Sep 12 102 (1971) 48 (1884) Sep 13
>>>>>>> 106 (1971) 48 (1884) Sep 14 100 (2012) 48
>>>>>>> (1898) Sep 15 103 (2012) 49 (1895) Sep 16
>>>>>>> 103 (2014) 48 (1884) Sep 17 108 (1913) 46
>>>>>>> (1884) Sep 18 103 (1939) 48 (1884) Sep 19
>>>>>>> 104 (1939) 49 (1907) Sep 20 107 (1939) 49
>>>>>>> (1900) Sep 21 108 (1885) 47 (1880) Sep 22
>>>>>>> 104 (1883) 48 (1895) Sep 23 104 (1978) 44
>>>>>>> (1880) Sep 24 106 (1978) 45 (1880) Sep 25
>>>>>>> 107 (1978) 48 (1879) Sep 26 109 (1963) 48
>>>>>>> (1893) Sep 27 113 (2010) 46 (1901) Sep 28
>>>>>>> 106 (1963) 49 (1901) Sep 29 102 (1999) 44
>>>>>>> (1880) Sep 30 105 (1906) 48 (1886)
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> What can we conclude from this data?
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Well, first and foremost, that the propagandists at the
>>>>>>> L.A. Times are full of shit. They're literally lying to
>>>>>>> promote an agenda.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> September is a hot month in L.A. and has been going back
>>>>>>> to the 1800s, long before SUVs, carbon footprints,
>>>>>>> 'climate change'. And notably, while there are some
>>>>>>> record highs set post-2000, not one of them is in 2024,
>>>>>>> which makes the Times' claim that our current heat wave
[continued in next message]
--- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
* Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)
|
