From: wolverine01@charter.net   
      
   On 11/21/2024 9:12 PM, bfh wrote:   
   > sticks wrote:   
      
   >>>> Nearly every field of science has these things where it is shown   
   >>>> they could not have happened on their own, Yet the naturalist will   
   >>>> never concede that even though the evidence points toward design,   
   >>>> there must have been a designer.   
   >   
   > What is this designer, and how did it come to be?   
   > Did it exist before the Big Bang?   
      
   These are the questions everyone has to grapple with.  My desire in this   
   is not to give my opinion on the question.  My point above probably   
   could have been worded better.  What I wished to convey was the attitude   
   among the naturalist group of scientists of shutting the door on hearing   
   anything once ID is invoked as a possibility.  Even if evidence points   
   that way it gets dismissed.  There is case after case of people getting   
   exiled from their respective scientific and educational community for   
   making such a glaring mistake.  I just want to show some of this   
   evidence to you.  You get to decide what to do with any of it.   
      
   >>>> That is not really true science.  It is simply living with a biased   
   >>>> paradigm that controls your thinking and exploration.  It is not   
   >>>> open minded.   
      
   --   
   I Stand With Israel!   
      
   --- SoupGate-DOS v1.05   
    * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)