[continued from previous message]   
      
   necessary to accomplish that feat. Accordingly, the probability of   
   evolving one molecule of iso-1-cytochrome c, a small protein common in   
   plants and animals, is an astounding one chance in 2.3 times ten billion   
   vigintillion. The magnitude of this impossibility may be appreciated by   
   realizing that ten billion vigintillion is one followed by 75 zeros. Or   
   to put it in evolutionary terms, if a random mutation is provided every   
   second from the alleged birth of the universe, then to date that protein   
   molecule would be only 43% of the way to completion. Yockey concluded,   
   "The origin of life by chance in a primeval soup is impossible in   
   probability in the same way that a perpetual motion machine is   
   impossible in probability."   
      
   To have a little fun on this, Mastropaolo says famed atheist and   
   supporter of evolutionary theory Richard Dawkins agreed when he states,   
   “Suppose we want to suggest, for instance, that life began when both DNA   
   and its protein-based replication machinery spontaneously chanced to   
   come into existence. We can allow ourselves the luxury of such an   
   extravagant theory, provided that the odds against this coincidence   
   occurring on a planet do not exceed 100 billion billion to one."  The   
   100 billion billion is 10^20. So Dawkins' own criterion for impossible   
   in probability, one chance in more than 10^20, has been exceeded by 50   
   orders of magnitude for only one molecule of one small protein. Now that   
   Professor Dawkins has joined the ranks of non-believers in evolution,   
   politesse forbids inquiring whether he considers himself "ignorant,   
   stupid, insane, or wicked."   
      
   It gets even more mathematically impossible in the rest of the article,   
   but I’ll let you read that on your own and only make one last cite.   
   “Life was designed. It did not evolve. The certainty of these   
   conclusions is 10^4,478,296 (1 followed by 4,478,296 zeros) to one.”   
   These numbers are not refuted, they simply get ignored.   
      
   There are so many tasks proteins do in the cell, it hard to fathom.  It   
   is the scope of what I am trying to get across, but they are so numerous   
   it is mind boggling.  I haven't even touched on the fact that every cell   
   contains the "information" necessary to perform its function, DNA, and   
   the fact that the energy necessary to form the DNA was unavailable.  All   
   of these different processes and actions have “chicken-or-egg problems   
   evolutionists must confront.”  The precise size and shape of each folded   
   protein is a perfect example with how it managed to form that way in the   
   first place.  How did lifeless, brainless amino acids form a protein,   
   folded in the perfect shape to do a specific task, at a specific   
   location in the body, in enough quantity, at just the right time?   
      
   I'll give three specific examples of this next I think you'll like, and   
   they all reside within the cell.   
      
      
   --   
   I Stand With Israel!   
      
   --- SoupGate-DOS v1.05   
    * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)