From: wolverine01@charter.net   
      
   On 11/23/2024 2:36 PM, bfh wrote:   
      
   > You seem to be leaning heavily toward intelligent design.   
      
   I am presenting evidence that says the naturalist explanation of how   
   things could have happened could not be so.  That actual scientists say   
   it is impossible.  These are not my opinions, these are leaders in their   
   fields, brilliant people who are willing to look into the actual science   
   in their fields.  In most cases, the evidence not only says the events   
   could not have happened on their own, or naturally, they point towards a   
   design involving information and intelligence.   
      
   That said, all this knowledge is available to anyone looking, including   
   other scientists.  It rarely gets refuted, often just ignored for the   
   reasons I have stated.  I'm always open to see any evidence   
   contradicting anything this evidence I have presented, just as I am   
   willing to look at anything that shows the opposite of what I am doing,   
   evidence showing there cannot have been an intelligent designer.   
      
   > Where do you   
   > speculate that the intelligent designer came from?   
      
   As I said earlier, I could answer that question, but that would be how I   
   chose to accept or reject the evidence against naturalism.  I will say   
   that the answer is not as simple as one would suppose.  In the end, I   
   simply don't care what people choose to do with the knowledge I think   
   this process gets you.  I could lay out why people with various beliefs   
   see things the way they do.  But if you don't at least come to an   
   understanding on whether or not you think the universe and the creation   
   of life could have happened on it's own or not, it's pointless.  I am   
   not trying to be theological.  I'm trying to be scientific.   
      
      
   --   
   I Stand With Israel!   
      
   --- SoupGate-DOS v1.05   
    * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)