Forums before death by AOL, social media and spammers... "We can't have nice things"
|    rec.outdoors.rv-travel    |    Discussions related to recreational vehi    |    163,839 messages    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
|    Message 163,774 of 163,839    |
|    sticks to bfh    |
|    Re: Smoke and CO Alarms    |
|    30 Oct 25 15:51:41    |
      From: wolverine01@charter.net              On 10/30/2025 3:43 PM, bfh wrote:       > sticks wrote:       >> On 10/30/2025 1:31 PM, bfh wrote:       >>> sticks wrote:       >>>> On 10/30/2025 12:09 AM, bfh wrote:       >>>>> sticks wrote:       >>>>>> Most of our units will have smoke and CO2 alarms in them. I       >>>>>> have added mine to the end of the season routine list for removing       >>>>>> the batteries. I will do this yearly and replace first time I get       >>>>>> ready to take them out with fresh ones. Doing this should give       >>>>>> adequate performance for the year, and removing them will also       >>>>>> ensure the batteries don't start leaking alkaline and ruin the       >>>>>> fixtures. They can also become a fire hazard in this state.       >>>>>> I have removed mine and placed a tape on reminder inside the RV to       >>>>>> replace them when I begin using it again.       >>>>>>       >>>>>> Something to consider doing.       >>>>>>       >>>>>       >>>>> Something else to consider:       >>>>       >>>>>       >>>>> In a camper (RV) that uses propane, the gas you need to worry about       >>>>> in terms of danger is carbon monoxide (CO)  not carbon       >>>>> dioxide (COâ‚‚).       >>>>       >>>> My day to be inefficacous. Bill is entirely correct that the       >>>> produced gas is CO and not CO2. I have changed the subject title       >>>> to correct this error. Anyway, do consider taking out the       >>>> batteries on these when in storage so they don't get mucked up.       >>>>       >>>> BTW, my unit, and I assume most others, does have a propane gas       >>>> detector, too. Unlike the smoke and CO alarms, the propane       >>>> detector in mine is hard wired to the house batteries. It will       >>>> always draw a very small amount of juice, but won't need battery       >>>> replacement.       >>>       >>> There's something I've thought about from time to time over the       >>> decades. Even my old 88 TT has a propane detector. Why don't campers       >>> also have CO detectors? Most people can smell propane, but nobody can       >>> smell CO. I must be missing something obvious.       >>       >> Google AI       >>       >> Are carbon monoxide detectors mandatory in RVs       >>       >> Thinking       >> Kicking off 7 searches       >> Looking at 114 sites       >> Putting it all together       >> While there is no single, all-encompassing federal law in the U.S.       >> requiring carbon monoxide (CO) detectors in RVs, multiple factors make       >> them mandatory for new vehicles and highly recommended for all others       >> . These factors include industry standards, state laws, Canadian       >> regulations, and safety requirements in the UK and Europe.       >> United States       >>       >> RVIA standards: The Recreational Vehicle Industry Association       >> (RVIA) requires all new RVs built to their standards to have       >> functioning CO detectors. A vast majority of new RVs sold in the U.S.       >> adhere to these standards.       >> Rental requirements: Many RV rental companies require their units       >> to be equipped with working CO detectors.       >> State and local laws: While not a federal mandate, some states       >> and local jurisdictions have their own CO alarm laws that may extend       >> to recreational vehicles.       >> Strong recommendation: Major RV safety organizations, including       >> the Escapees RV Club, strongly recommend that all RVs have a       >> functional CO detector, regardless of age or existing regulations.       >> Many older RVs were manufactured before these standards were common,       >> so owners must install their own.       >>       >       > Well, hell. I'm behind again - but yours doesn't have one, or does it?       >              Mine has all three. I just had the wrong gas in my brain when I wrote       the original post which you correctly noticed.                     --       Science doesn't support Darwin. Scientists do.              --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05        * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
(c) 1994, bbs@darkrealms.ca