XPost: alt.animals.ethics.vegetarian, alt.food.vegan, talk.politics.animals
From: derek.nash@gmail.com
On Wed, 02 Feb 2005 18:16:25 GMT, dh_ld@nomail.com wrote:
>From: Rudy Canoza
>Newsgroups: alt.animals.ethics.vegetarian,alt.food.vegan,talk.p
litics.animals,rec.pets.dogs.misc
>Subject: Re: How to view farm animals? Answer: don't view them as Fuckwit
David Harrison does
>Message-ID:
>Date: Mon, 31 Jan 2005 00:39:43 GMT
>
>Non-existent - but NOT imaginary - farm animals for
>some bizarre reason have some kind of reality
>ŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻ
When clicking on that message ID you supplied, if you
go to that sentence Jon wrote it finishes by referring
to you and your beliefs, Harrison, but you unethically
left that part off to lead the reader into believing Jon
himself believes non-existent farm animals have some
form of reality instead.
"Non-existent - but NOT imaginary - farm animals for
some bizarre reason have some kind of reality to you."
Why did you lie, Harrison?
--- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
* Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)
|
