XPost: alt.animals.ethics.vegetarian, rec.pets.cats.misc, rec.pets.birds   
      
   On Sun, 08 May 2005 17:52:37 GMT, Rudy Canoza  wrote:   
      
   >dh@. wrote:   
   >   
   >> On Sat, 07 May 2005 17:31:07 GMT, Rudy Canoza  wrote:   
   >>   
   >>   
   >>>Joanne wrote:   
   >>>   
   >>>   
   >>>> wrote in message news:erpp71hc492ggf5mjj2odk3l6etf0b2vqu@4ax.com...   
   >>>>   
   >>>>   
   >>>>>On Thu, 05 May 2005 21:03:59 GMT, Rudy Canoza  wrote:   
   >>>>>  Animals experience disappointment Goo. Almost any   
   >>>>>child with a dog could tell you about it. It doesn't mean   
   >>>>>that all animals can, but it does mean some of them   
   >>>>>can.   
   >>>>   
   >>>>   
   >>>>Definitely true of parrots.  Billy, my Severe Macaw makes a disappointed   
   >>>>vocal when he wants to come out to play and I have to walk away without   
   him.   
   >>>>It's not a scream for attention; it's a quick, low vocalization of   
   >>>>disappointment without doubt.   
   >>>   
   >>>Bullshit.   
   >>   
   >>   
   >>     She is quite likely to be a good and decent person   
   >   
   >That's lovely.  She still said some bullshit, though.   
   >   
   >   
   >>>You are projecting.  It's called   
   >>>anthropomorphization:  the projection of human   
   >>>characteristics onto non-human things.   
   >>   
   >>   
   >>     LOL!!! For one thing Goo   
   >   
   >Fuckwit,  we have been through this before:  YOU are   
   >the goober.  "Goober" is an insult and slur against   
   >stupid fuckwitted southern rednecks, and YOU are the   
   >stupid fuckwitted southern redneck.  YOU are the   
   >Goober.  Don't make this mistake again.   
      
       Goo is short for Goober. Goober is short for Goobernicus.   
   You are Goobernicus Gonad. You "think" you are a genius   
   and know everthing, so you don't try to learn, so you're really   
   ignorant, and ignorant because you're too stupid to know it.   
      
   >> you are the LAST person who   
   >> could possibly have a clue about something like that   
   >   
   >No, Fuckwit.  I am the one who knows about this.   
      
       You don't even know what the hell we're talking about.   
   Goobernicus.   
      
   >You   
   >didn't even know the word "anthropomorphization" until   
   >I told it to you, and it's doubtful you even really   
   >know what it means now.   
      
       Some animals experience disappointment, and you are   
   too stupid to realise it. Recognition of the fact is not   
   anthropomorphism. This fantasy however, is:   
      
   "it were unseemly for me, who am to-day a pig, and to-morrow   
   but ham and sausages, to dispute with a master of ethics, yet   
   to my porcine intellect..."   
      
   I should have been keeping a list of your lies that I have   
   exposed over the years. It would be huge. Here again I'll   
   expose you as a liar, with this example of me pointing out   
   that your "AR" fantasy is an incredible example of   
   anthropomorphism:   
   _________________________________________________________   
   From: dh_ld@nomail.com   
   Subject: exposing Jonathan Ball & Dutch as "ARAs"   
   Date: Sun, 13 Jun 2004 20:23:05 GMT   
      
   we now have   
   absolute proof that both Dutch and the Gonad are "ARAs" who accept   
   the beliefs of one of the earliest fathers of the "AR" concept, and one   
   of the earliest promoters of vegetarianism. That early father of "AR" was   
   Henry S. Salt. Here is absolute proof that they both accept Salt's beliefs   
   ...this particular incredibly anthropomorphic example is from a fantasy that   
   they consider to be the position of pigs:   
   ¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯   
   It would appear that you learned the term from me, and are   
   now trying to apply it to a situation that is not anthropomorphic.   
   I certainly hope no one who reads your lies is stupid enough   
   to believe them Goo.   
      
   --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05   
    * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)