XPost: alt.animals.ethics.vegetarian, rec.pets.cats.misc, rec.pets.birds   
      
   On 13 May 2005 09:58:06 -0700, "Rudy Canoza"  wrote:   
      
   >dh@. wrote:   
   >> On 12 May 2005 10:18:32 -0700, "Rudy Canoza"    
   >wrote:   
   >>   
   >> >dh@. wrote:   
   >> >> On 9 May 2005 10:58:09 -0700, "Rudy Canoza"    
   >> >wrote:   
   >> >>   
   >> >> > He is incapable of seeing the real flaw in their argument   
   >> >>   
   >> >>     What is then Goo?   
   >> >   
   >> >Your question doesn't make any sense.   
   >>   
   >>     That's because you don't believe there is any "real flaw in their   
   >argument".   
   >   
   >"What is then" was an absurd question, Fuckwit.   
   >   
   >There are several serious flaws,   
      
       There sure are, and you don't have a clue about any of them.   
      
   >and I have correctly identified them.   
   >You have not.  You have come up with a goofy idea because you feel the   
   >need to justify that you kill animals.   
      
   --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05   
    * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)