XPost: alt.animals.ethics.vegetarian, rec.pets.cats.misc, alt.pets.rabbits
XPost: rec.pets.birds
On Tue, 28 Jun 2005 00:54:29 -0600, Leslie wrote:
>Found scrawled in the outhouse on Sun, 26 Jun 2005 13:51:42 -0400, dh@. wrote:
>
>>On Sat, 25 Jun 2005 22:15:33 -0700, "Dutch" wrote:
>>
>>>
>>> wrote in message news:dmorb1licq0lkfvlu619ve74athbvhooco@4ax.com...
>>>> On Sat, 25 Jun 2005 11:07:13 -0700, "Dutch" wrote:
>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> wrote in message news:us3mb15apo2mhpln6ejv6kdp707jlsksk5@4ax.com...
>>>>>> On Mon, 20 Jun 2005 21:31:55 -0700, "Dutch" wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>"Leslie" wrote
>>>>>>>> Found scrawled in the outhouse on Sun, 19 Jun 2005 13:28:21 -0400,
>>>>>>>> dh@.
>>>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>On Sun, 19 Jun 2005 12:26:35 -0400, +- wrote:
>
>>>>>>>> Yes, this is the agenda of ARA's. However, I'm a little confused about
>>>>>>>> your political
>>>>>>>> position here. Some of the things that I have read sound a little
>>>>>>>> close
>>>>>>>> to
>>>>>>>> ascribing to
>>>>>>>> the notion that animals have "some" rights. But the statements above
>>>>>>>> would
>>>>>>>> also lead me to
>>>>>>>> believe that you are opposed to ARAs (animal rights activists). Is
>>>>>>>> your
>>>>>>>> political position
>>>>>>>> more in line with animal welfare rather than any rights?
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Just trying to be polite and fair.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>It is a combination of animal "right to life"
>>>>>>
>>>>>> That's a lie. Any supposed "right to life" would
>>>>>> require at the very least a zygote imo, so again
>>>>>> (as always) you have lied about mo.
>
>Why are you limiting life to a zygote?
I'm not. A zygote is the beginning of each particular life.
>Under these circumstances
WHICH circumstances?
>then you would *have* to
>believe that a fertilized chicken egg has a right to life
--- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
* Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)
|
