XPost: alt.animals.ethics.vegetarian, rec.pets.cats.misc, alt.pets.rabbits   
   XPost: rec.pets.birds   
      
    · Though we have no reason to believe there would   
   be any loss suffered by potential future animals if   
   "they" are never born, billions more farm animals will   
   be born if the Gonad's suggestion to do away with   
   them is not accepted, as I pointed out on 08/01/00.   
    Revised - 02/04/05   
   _________________________________________________________   
   From: jonball52@altavista.com (Jonathan Ball)   
   Newsgroups: alt.animals.ethics.vegetarian,talk.politics.animals,alt.food.vegan   
   Subject: Re: How Jonathan Ball wants people to feel about the silly arse,   
   Fuckwith   
   Date: 11 Apr 2002 18:53:15 -0700   
      
   People who don't want them to exist should be "vegans".   
   ŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻ   
   _________________________________________________________   
   From: Rudy Canoza    
   Newsgroups: alt.animals.ethics.vegetarian,talk.politics.animals,alt.food.vegan   
   Subject: Re: Skunky pisses all over the trolls   
   Message-ID:    
   Date: Sat, 29 Jan 2005 19:02:08 GMT   
      
   "giving them life" does NOT mitigate the wrongness of   
   their deaths   
   ŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻ   
   _________________________________________________________   
   From: Dieter    
   Newsgroups: talk.politics.animals,alt.philosophy,talk.philosophy   
   misc,alt.agnosticism,sci.skeptic   
   Subject: Re: Existence is not a benefit   
   Message-ID:    
   Date: Tue, 22 Jun 2004 22:51:07 GMT   
      
   logically one MUST conclude that not raising them in the   
   first place is the ethically superior choice.   
   ŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻ   
   _________________________________________________________   
   From: Wilson Woods    
   Date: Sat, 15 May 2004 19:44:22 GMT   
      
   It is morally wrong, in an absolute sense   
   - unjust, in other words - if humans kill animals they   
   don't need to kill, i.e. not in self defense. There's   
   your answer.   
   ŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻ   
   _________________________________________________________   
   Message-ID: <40423A83.5040207@whitehouse.not>   
   From: Jonathan Ball    
   User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Win 9x 4.90; en-US; rv:1.4)   
   Gecko/20030624 Netscape/7.1 (ax)   
   Newsgroups: talk.politics.animals,alt.animals.ethics.vegetarian   
   Subject: Karen Winter's abandonment of her son, and why it matters   
   Date: Sun, 29 Feb 2004 19:15:39 GMT   
      
   killing the animals needlessly and merely for human convenience   
   is the worst violation of their rights.   
   ŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻ   
   _________________________________________________________   
   From: "Rudy Canoza"    
   Date: 2 Mar 2005 10:07:16 -0800   
      
   Humans could change it. They could change it by ending it.   
   ŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻ   
   _________________________________________________________   
   From: Rudy Canoza    
   Date: Sat, 26 Feb 2005 20:59:45 GMT   
      
   There is no "selfishness" involved in wanting farm   
   animals not to exist as a step towards creating a more   
   just world.   
   ŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻ·   
      
   --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05   
    * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)   
|