Forums before death by AOL, social media and spammers... "We can't have nice things"
|    rec.pets.dogs.misc    |    All other topics, chat, humor, etc    |    8,070 messages    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
|    Message 6,694 of 8,070    |
|    Louis Boyd to Elmo    |
|    Re: Dogs and anticipation?    |
|    03 Jul 05 08:55:29    |
      XPost: alt.animals.ethics.vegetarian, rec.pets.dogs.health, misc.rural       From: boyd@apt0.sao.arizona.edu              Elmo wrote:       > whatthe@fu?.com said (on or about) 07/01/2005 14:31:       >       >> On Fri, 01 Jul 2005 04:49:10 GMT, Goo wrote:       >>       >>> No dog has any sense of anticipation longer than a       >>> couple of seconds.       >>       >> Can you back up that absurd sounding claim?       >       > I don't know about anticipation but it's my experience that dog's have       > very little sense of time. If I walk up to the mailbox and back (less       > than 5 minutes) I get the same greeting as I do when I've been away all       > day. So for a dog, anything more than a few minutes is roughly       > equivalent to "forever".              For pet parrots the situation is different. If you return after a few       hours they'll greet you happily. If you've been gone several days       they'll typically bite you, perhaps for having been away so long. A few       hours later they're just as happy to see you as before.              But what does it matter. The concept of time is an artifact of human       civilization. What animal has any reason to care about time at all?       Sure, conditions change with time, but it's only present conditions most       animals have any reason to care about. Sure, some animals seem to       prepare for the future, but that doesn't really mean squirrels know that       it will snow eight months after nuts are plentiful. It only means the       squirrels which did for some reason decide to store more nuts than those       which didn't had a better survival rate.              Ants obviously aren't as intellegent as humans, but there certainly are       a lot more of them on this planet. Does that mean they're more       successful and better adapted?              --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05        * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
(c) 1994, bbs@darkrealms.ca