XPost: alt.animals.ethics.vegetarian, rec.pets.dogs.health, misc.rural   
      
   On Sun, 03 Jul 2005 07:25:45 +1000, Brock Ulfsen  wrote:   
      
   >Rudy Canoza wrote:   
   >> The jacket was a signal.  Animals respond to signals. Dr. Pavlov   
   >> demonstrated that over 100 years ago.   
   >   
   >> That isn't the same thing as anticipation.  If you tell your dog today   
   >> you're going to go rabbit hunting tomorrow, the dog will stare at you   
   >> stupidly.   
   >   
   >Demonstrate how programmed behaviour in response to stimuli in dogs   
   >(bell = food) is any different to anticipation in humans "Let's go to   
   >McDonalds" causes salivation and other observable behaviour...   
   >   
   >...Brock.   
      
       It's all the same, but Goo hilariously can't even tell the difference   
   between an inability to understand English, and an inability to experience   
   anticipation. LOL...and he considers himself some type of authority on   
   animal emotions even though he can't pick up on an obvious distinction   
   like that. Hilarious!!! That's why he's Goobernicus.   
      
   --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05   
    * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)