XPost: alt.animals.ethics.vegetarian, rec.pets.cats.misc, alt.pets.rabbits
XPost: rec.pets.birds
From: usenet.email@gmail.com
On Sun, 03 Jul 2005 15:51:21 -0400, dh@. wrote:
>On Sun, 03 Jul 2005 11:48:10 -0600, Leslie wrote:
>>Found scrawled in the outhouse on Wed, 29 Jun 2005 14:56:46 -0400, dh@.
wrote:
>>>Leslie wrote:
>>>
>>>>I am only reflecting back what I have read in some of your earlier posts.
>>>
>>> You're not able to present an example of me advocating any right to
life.
>>>You're lying about it.
>>
>>You have been advocating a right
>
> That's a lie.
No, it isn't. You've been promoting rights for animals
for a very long time now. Read the following I wrote
to you on this matter in 2003 (below).
What gives you the right to want to deprive
them [unborn animals] of having what life
they could have?
David Harrison - 10/12/2001
You're an ARA, Dave. You insist that my human rights
don't trump the rights of unborn farm animals. I don't
mind you being an ARA, but we're trying to remove the
extreme element in our movement right now, and your
idea that we must provide a right to life for unborn
animals is too extreme to allow you full membership at
this time, but please feel free to re-apply when you've
relaxed your views a little.
Derek May 2 2003 http://tinyurl.com/av8wr
Also, you believe that THE WRONG is in failing to
provide animals with rights, even to the non-existent
future ones.
"The "wrong" is that "Animal Rights" would not
provide future farm animals with rights, so it
should be given a more honest name."
David Harrison Apr 30 2003 http://tinyurl.com/c98rk
--- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
* Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)
|
