XPost: alt.animals.ethics.vegetarian, rec.pets.cats.misc, alt.pets.rabbits   
   XPost: rec.pets.birds   
      
   On Mon, 04 Jul 2005 15:49:43 GMT, Rudy Canoza  wrote:   
      
   >dh@. wrote:   
   >   
   >> On Sun, 03 Jul 2005 21:11:01 GMT, Rudy Canoza  wrote:   
   >>   
   >>   
   >>>dh@. wrote:   
   >>   
   >>   
   >>>>Domestic animals are   
   >>>>completely dependant on us for the pairing of sperm and egg which   
   >>>>begin their particular lives. Those particular animals only exist because   
   >>>>humans raise them, and if they were set free so humans no longer   
   >>>>had such infuence the same animals would not be born. The human   
   >>>>situation is different because humans are already free.   
   >>>   
   >>>Completely false.  All humans ALSO are dependent on the   
   >>>thoughts and actions of earlier humans for the pairing   
   >>>of the sperm and egg that results in a new human.  They   
   >>>are no different from these domestic animals you   
   >>>misunderstand.   
   >>   
   >>   
   >>     Yes they are.   
   >   
   >No, they aren't.   
      
       They are free to travel the world in search of someone   
   else to fuck. Domestic animals are not.   
      
   >Empty assertion, Fuckwit, again.   
      
       It's another one of those things   
   you're just too stupid to understand.   
      
   --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05   
    * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)